Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Risk Preference on Construction Bid Markups

被引:22
作者
Liu, Junying [1 ]
Cui, Zhipeng [1 ]
Yang, Xiaojun [2 ]
Skitmore, Martin [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Dept Construct Management, Coll Management & Econ, 92 Weijin Rd, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Adm, 28 West Xianning Rd, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] QUT, Sch Civil Engn & Built Environm, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[4] Tongji Univ, Res Inst Complex Engn & Management, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Bidding; Markups; Risk preference; Experiment; AMBIGUITY AVERSION; BIDDING STRATEGY; EXPECTED UTILITY; CONTRACTORS; DECISIONS; CHOICE; INCOMPLETENESS; HETEROGENEITY; PROBABILITY; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000596
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Risk preference plays an important role in decision making. The objective of this article is to show how much risk preferences influence bid-price decision making in bidding for construction contracts. Based on the literature review and interviews, the authors designed a bidding situation and conducted an experiment to test decision- maker responses. In total, 172 participants with lengthy experience in bidding for construction work took part in the experiment. Both descriptive statistics and regression analysis were used for deep information mining of the data. Risk preference was found to have a significantly positive effect on bid markups. Based on a comparison of the influences of risk preferences on the bid price in different competitive bidding situations, the results show that the bid price decreased with the number of bidders, and it was even lower when the number of bidders was unknown. Therefore, considering both risk preference and the number of bidders is important in reasonable decision making. Finally, advice is also provided to construction companies for evaluating the leader's decisions and the decision-making team.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Construction Bidding Markup Estimation Using a Multistage Decision Theory Approach [J].
Abotaleb, Ibrahim S. ;
EI-adaway, Islam H. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 143 (01)
[2]   Are risk preferences stable? Comparing an experimental measure with a validated survey-based measure [J].
Anderson, Lisa R. ;
Mellor, Jennifer M. .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2009, 39 (02) :137-160
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing
[4]   Developing a Virtual Laboratory for Construction Bidding Environment Using Agent-Based Modeling [J].
Awwad, Rita ;
Asgari, Sadegh ;
Kandil, Amr .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2015, 29 (06)
[5]  
Baker RJ, 2008, SOUTH ECON J, V75, P367
[6]   The roles of risk and ambiguity in technology adoption [J].
Barham, Bradford L. ;
Chavas, Jean-Paul ;
Fitz, Dylan ;
Salas, Vanessa Rios ;
Schechter, Laura .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2014, 97 :204-218
[7]  
Barreda-Tarrazona I, 2011, REV ESP FINANC CONTA, V40, P613
[8]   Dealing With Uncertainty: Testing Risk-and Ambiguity-Attitude Across Adolescence [J].
Blankenstein, Neeltje E. ;
Crone, Eveline A. ;
van den Bos, Wouter ;
van Duijvenvoorde, Anna C. K. .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 41 (1-2) :77-92
[9]   Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence from South African Fishing Communities [J].
Brick, Kerri ;
Visser, Martine ;
Burns, Justine .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 94 (01) :133-152
[10]   RISK AND RATIONALITY: UNCOVERING HETEROGENEITY IN PROBABILITY DISTORTION [J].
Bruhin, Adrian ;
Fehr-Duda, Helga ;
Epper, Thomas .
ECONOMETRICA, 2010, 78 (04) :1375-1412