Development and evaluation of machine learning models for voxel dose predictions in online adaptive magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy

被引:9
作者
Thomas, M. Allan [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Yabo [1 ,3 ]
Yang, Deshan [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Imaging Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2020年 / 21卷 / 07期
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
adaptive radiation therapy; dose prediction; knowledge-based prediction; magnetic resonance image guidance; KNOWLEDGE-BASED PREDICTION; CANCER; SMART; CHEMOTHERAPY; MALIGNANCIES; RADIOTHERAPY; MANAGEMENT; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; MOTION;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12884
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Daily online adaptive plan quality in magnetic resonance imaging guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) is difficult to assess in relation to the fully optimized, high quality plans traditionally established offline. Machine learning prediction models developed in this work are capable of predicting 3D dose distributions, enabling the evaluation of online adaptive plan quality to better inform adaptive decision-making in MRgRT. Methods Artificial neural networks predicted 3D dose distributions from input variables related to patient anatomy, geometry, and target/organ-at-risk relationships in over 300 treatment plans from 53 patients receiving adaptive, linac-based MRgRT for abdominal cancers. The models do not include any beam related variables such as beam angles or fluence and were optimized to balance errors related to raw dose and specific plan quality metrics used to guide daily online adaptive decisions. Results Averaged over all plans, the dose prediction error and the absolute error were 0.1 +/- 3.4 Gy (0.1 +/- 6.2%) and 3.5 +/- 2.4 Gy (6.4 +/- 4.3%) respectively. Plan metric prediction errors were -0.1 +/- 1.5%, -0.5 +/- 2.1%, -0.9 +/- 2.2 Gy, and 0.1 +/- 2.7 Gy for V95, V100, D95, and D(mean)respectively. Plan metric prediction absolute errors were 1.1 +/- 1.1%, 1.5 +/- 1.5%, 1.9 +/- 1.4 Gy, and 2.2 +/- 1.6 Gy. Approximately 10% (25) of the plans studied were clearly identified by the prediction models as inferior quality plans needing further optimization and refinement. Conclusion Machine learning prediction models for treatment plan 3D dose distributions in online adaptive MRgRT were developed and tested. Clinical integration of the models requires minimal effort, producing 3D dose predictions for a new patient's plan using only target and OAR structures as inputs. These models can enable improved workflows for MRgRT through more informed plan optimization and plan quality assessment in real time.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 69
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Motion management in gastrointestinal cancers
    Abbas, Hassan
    Chang, Bryan
    Chen, Zhe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 5 (03) : 223 - 235
  • [2] Online Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy: First Clinical Applications
    Acharya, Sahaja
    Fischer-Valuck, Benjamin W.
    Kashani, Rojano
    Parikh, Parag
    Yang, Deshan
    Zhao, Tianyu
    Green, Olga
    Wooten, Omar
    Li, H. Harold
    Hu, Yanle
    Rodriguez, Vivian
    Olsen, Lindsey
    Robinson, Clifford
    Michalski, Jeff
    Mutic, Sasa
    Olsen, Jeffrey
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 94 (02): : 394 - 403
  • [3] Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning
    Appenzoller, Lindsey M.
    Michalski, Jeff M.
    Thorstad, Wade L.
    Mutic, Sasa
    Moore, Kevin L.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (12) : 7446 - 7461
  • [4] Three-dimensional dose prediction for lung IMRT patients with deep neural networks: robust learning from heterogeneous beam configurations
    Barragan-Montero, Ana Maria
    Dan Nguyen
    Lu, Weiguo
    Lin, Mu-Han
    Norouzi-Kandalan, Roya
    Geets, Xavier
    Sterpin, Edmond
    Jiang, Steve
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (08) : 3679 - 3691
  • [5] QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES OF NORMAL TISSUE EFFECTS IN THE CLINIC (QUANTEC): AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SCIENTIFIC ISSUES
    Bentzen, Soren M.
    Constine, Louis S.
    Deasy, Joseph O.
    Eisbruch, Avi
    Jackson, Andrew
    Marks, Lawrence B.
    Ten Haken, Randall K.
    Yorke, Ellen D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (03): : S3 - S9
  • [6] Fast and robust online adaptive planning in stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for pancreatic cancer
    Bohoudi, O.
    Bruynzeel, A. M. E.
    Senan, S.
    Cuijpers, J. P.
    Slotman, B. J.
    Lagerwaard, F. J.
    Palacios, M. A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 125 (03) : 439 - 444
  • [7] A practical implementation of physics quality assurance for photon adaptive radiotherapy
    Cai, Bin
    Green, Olga L.
    Kashani, Rojano
    Rodriguez, Vivian L.
    Mutic, Sasa
    Yang, Deshan
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2018, 28 (03): : 211 - 223
  • [8] Neural network dose models for knowledge-based planning in pancreatic SBRT
    Campbell, Warren G.
    Miften, Moyed
    Olsen, Lindsey
    Stumpf, Priscilla
    Schefter, Tracey
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    Jones, Bernard L.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (12) : 6148 - 6158
  • [9] A machine learning approach to the accurate prediction of multi-leaf collimator positional errors
    Carlson, Joel N. K.
    Park, Jong Min
    Park, So-Yeon
    Park, Jong In
    Choi, Yunseok
    Ye, Sung-Joon
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (06) : 2514 - 2531
  • [10] Quantification of Interfractional Gastrointestinal Tract Motion for Pancreatic Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Chen, I.
    Mittauer, K. E.
    Henke, L. E.
    Acharya, S.
    Lu, Y.
    Chen, C. C.
    Rosenberg, S. A.
    Geurts, M. W.
    Wojeieszynski, A. P.
    Parikh, P. J.
    Bassetti, M.
    Kashani, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E144 - E144