Current trends in interprofessional education of health sciences students: A literature review

被引:261
作者
Abu-Rish, Erin [1 ]
Kim, Sara [2 ]
Choe, Lapio [3 ]
Varpio, Lara [4 ]
Malik, Elisabeth [1 ]
White, Andrew A. [5 ]
Craddick, Karen [6 ]
Blondon, Katherine [7 ]
Robins, Lynne [8 ]
Nagasawa, Pamela [1 ]
Thigpen, Allison [1 ]
Chen, Lee-Ling [1 ]
Rich, Joanne [1 ]
Zierler, Brenda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Nursing, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Seattle Univ, Coll Nursing, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
[4] Univ Ottawa, Acad Innovat Med Educ, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Sch Pharm, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[8] Univ Washington, Dept Med Educ, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Interprofessional education; literature review; health professional students; INTERDISCIPLINARITY; MULTIDISCIPLINARITY; TRANSDISCIPLINARITY; SERVICES; POLICY;
D O I
10.3109/13561820.2012.715604
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
There is a pressing need to redesign health professions education and integrate an interprofessional and systems approach into training. At the core of interprofessional education (IPE) are creating training synergies across healthcare professions and equipping learners with the collaborative skills required for today's complex healthcare environment. Educators are increasingly experimenting with new IPE models, but best practices for translating IPE into interprofessional practice and team-based care are not well defined. Our study explores current IPE models to identify emerging trends in strategies reported in published studies. We report key characteristics of 83 studies that report IPE activities between 2005 and 2010, including those utilizing qualitative, quantitative and mixed method research approaches. We found a wide array of IPE models and educational components. Although most studies reported outcomes in student learning about professional roles, team communication and general satisfaction with IPE activities, our review identified inconsistencies and shortcomings in how IPE activities are conceptualized, implemented, assessed and reported. Clearer specifications of minimal reporting requirements are useful for developing and testing IPE models that can inform and facilitate successful translation of IPE best practices into academic and clinical practice arenas.
引用
收藏
页码:444 / 451
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert panel
[2]  
Barr H., 2002, LEARNING TEACHING SU
[3]  
Barr Hugh, 2006, J Interprof Care, V20, P75
[4]  
Barr Hugh, 2006, J Interprof Care, V20, P96, DOI 10.1080/13561820600649771
[5]  
Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative, 2010, NAT INT COMP FRAM
[6]  
Choi BCK, 2008, CLIN INVEST MED, V31, pE41
[7]   Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement [J].
Choi, Bernard C. K. ;
Pak, Anita W. P. .
CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 30 (06) :E224-E232
[8]  
Choi BCK, 2006, CLIN INVEST MED, V29, P351
[9]  
D'Amour Danielle, 2005, J Interprof Care, V19 Suppl 1, P116, DOI 10.1080/13561820500082529
[10]  
Freeth Della, 2004, J Interprof Care, V18, P43, DOI 10.1080/13561820310001608221