Prioritizing low-stress and equitable bicycle networks using neighborhood-based accessibility measures

被引:23
作者
Kent, Margaret [1 ]
Karner, Alex [2 ]
机构
[1] Kittelson & Associates Inc, Boston, MA USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Sch Architecture, Grad Program Community & Reg Planning, 310 Inner Campus Dr B7500, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Bicycle planning; bikeability; level of traffic stress; social equity; spatial analysis;
D O I
10.1080/15568318.2018.1443177
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As cities across the United States strive to create comfortable bicycle networks for mainstream users, three topics have garnered attention: project prioritization criteria, accessibility to everyday destinations, and social equity. However, these topics have not often been integrated in research or practice. This paper introduces a method to assess the extent to which reductions in "Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress" (LTS) on segments of a citywide bicycle network increase accessibility to supermarkets, pharmacies, banks, and public libraries. Six accessibility performance measures are developed and evaluated for 278 neighborhoods in Baltimore, Maryland using a GIS-based approach. The demographic distributions of accessibility results are further analyzed, focusing on disadvantaged populations. Using a set of 106 proposed bicycle projects, the marginal accessibility gains and cumulative demographic impact across affected neighborhoods are assessed for each project. These results are ranked and crosslisted to identify a set of projects that balance accessibility gains with equity objectives. The prioritization results demonstrate some overlap with the short-term priorities embodied in City of Baltimore's 2015 Bike Master Plan, but they also highlight projects in other areas, specifically those that would serve neighborhoods most disadvantaged in terms of racial segregation, high poverty rates, and low rates of vehicle ownership.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 110
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, BICYCLIST PERCEIVED
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, BICYCLE JUSTICE URBA
[3]  
Bearn C. B., 2015, Measuring Low Stress Bike Access to MARTA
[4]  
Buehler R, 2012, URBAN IND ENVIRON, P287
[5]  
City of Baltimore, 2015, BALT BIK MAST PLAN
[6]   Four Types of Cyclists? Examination of Typology for Better Understanding of Bicycling Behavior and Potential [J].
Dill, Jennifer ;
McNeil, Nathan .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2013, (2387) :129-138
[7]   Network Connectivity for Low-Stress Bicycling [J].
Furth, Peter G. ;
Mekuria, Maaza C. ;
Nixon, Hilary .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2016, (2587) :41-49
[8]  
Garrard J, 2012, URBAN IND ENVIRON, P31
[9]  
Golub A., 2016, Bicycle Justice and Urban Transformation: Biking for All?, P20
[10]   Nonwork Accessibility as a Social Equity Indicator [J].
Grengs, Joe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION, 2015, 9 (01) :1-14