How quickly do publications get read? The evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articles

被引:47
作者
Maflahi, Nabeil [1 ]
Thelwall, Mike [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wolverhampton, Stat Cybermetr Res Grp, Wolverhampton, W Midlands, England
关键词
CITATIONS; IMPACT; WEB; INFORMATION; METRICS; INDICATOR; JOURNALS;
D O I
10.1002/asi.23909
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Within science, citation counts are widely used to estimate research impact but publication delays mean that they are not useful for recent research. This gap can be filled by Mendeley reader counts, which are valuable early impact indicators for academic articles because they appear before citations and correlate strongly with them. Nevertheless, it is not known how Mendeley readership counts accumulate within the year of publication, and so it is unclear how soon they can be used. In response, this paper reports a longitudinal weekly study of the Mendeley readers of articles in 6 library and information science journals from 2016. The results suggest that Mendeley readers accrue from when articles are first available online and continue to steadily build. For journals with large publication delays, articles can already have substantial numbers of readers by their publication date. Thus, Mendeley reader counts may even be useful as early impact indicators for articles before they have been officially published in a journal issue. If field normalized indicators are needed, then these can be generated when journal issues are published using the online first date.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 167
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[11]   National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers [J].
Fairclough, Ruth ;
Thelwall, Mike .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2015, 9 (04) :845-859
[12]   The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective [J].
Franceschet, Massimo ;
Costantini, Antonio .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2011, 5 (02) :275-291
[13]   Journal impact measures in bibliometric research [J].
Glanzel, W ;
Moed, HF .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2002, 53 (02) :171-193
[14]  
Gunn W., 2013, Inf Stand Q, V25, P33, DOI [DOI 10.3789/ISQV25NO2.2013.06, 10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.06]
[15]  
Haustein S, 2015, PRO INT CONF SCI INF, P1170
[16]   Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: How do these two social media metrics differ? [J].
Haustein, Stefanie ;
LariviSre, Vincent ;
Thelwall, Mike ;
Amyot, Didier ;
Peters, Isabella .
IT-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 56 (05) :207-215
[17]  
Higher Education Funding Council for England, 2015, METR TID CORR AN REF
[18]   Assessing the Impact of Disciplinary Research on Teaching: An Automatic Analysis of Online Syllabuses [J].
Kousha, Kayvan ;
Thelwall, Mike .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 59 (13) :2060-2069
[19]   Using the Web for research evaluation: The Integrated Online Impact indicator [J].
Kousha, Kayvan ;
Thelwall, Mike ;
Rezaie, Somayeh .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2010, 4 (01) :124-135
[20]   Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement [J].
Li, Xuemei ;
Thelwall, Mike ;
Giustini, Dean .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2012, 91 (02) :461-471