How quickly do publications get read? The evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articles

被引:47
作者
Maflahi, Nabeil [1 ]
Thelwall, Mike [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wolverhampton, Stat Cybermetr Res Grp, Wolverhampton, W Midlands, England
关键词
CITATIONS; IMPACT; WEB; INFORMATION; METRICS; INDICATOR; JOURNALS;
D O I
10.1002/asi.23909
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Within science, citation counts are widely used to estimate research impact but publication delays mean that they are not useful for recent research. This gap can be filled by Mendeley reader counts, which are valuable early impact indicators for academic articles because they appear before citations and correlate strongly with them. Nevertheless, it is not known how Mendeley readership counts accumulate within the year of publication, and so it is unclear how soon they can be used. In response, this paper reports a longitudinal weekly study of the Mendeley readers of articles in 6 library and information science journals from 2016. The results suggest that Mendeley readers accrue from when articles are first available online and continue to steadily build. For journals with large publication delays, articles can already have substantial numbers of readers by their publication date. Thus, Mendeley reader counts may even be useful as early impact indicators for articles before they have been officially published in a journal issue. If field normalized indicators are needed, then these can be generated when journal issues are published using the online first date.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 167
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics [J].
Adie, Euan ;
Roe, William .
LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2013, 26 (01) :11-+
[2]   Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: Methodological approaches to 'webometrics' [J].
Almind, TC ;
Ingwersen, P .
JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 1997, 53 (04) :404-426
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, PLOS ALM WORKSH SAN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SIG MET WORKSH
[5]  
[Anonymous], P 17 INT C SCI TECHN
[6]  
Bar-Ilan J, 2014, ACM WEB SCI C 2014 W
[7]   Astrophysics publications on arXiv, Scopus and Mendeley: a case study [J].
Bar-Ilan, Judit .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 100 (01) :217-225
[8]   Measuring researchers' use of scholarly information through social bookmarking data: A case study of BibSonomy [J].
Borrego, Angel ;
Fry, Jenny .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2012, 38 (03) :297-308
[9]   Generation reference management software: comparative analysis of ReWorks, EndNote web and Zotero [J].
Cordon-Garcia, Jose A. ;
Martin-Rodero, Helena ;
Alonso-Arevalo, Julio .
PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2009, 18 (04) :445-454
[10]   Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact [J].
Eysenbach, Gunther .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (04) :e123