US of ductal carcinoma in situ

被引:100
作者
Moon, WK
Myung, JS
Lee, YJ
Park, IA
Noh, DY
Im, JG
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Clin Res Inst, Chongno Gu, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Clin Res Inst, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Clin Res Inst, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Med Res Ctr, Inst Radiat Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
breast neoplasms; calcifications; diagnosis; US;
D O I
10.1148/radiographics.22.2.g02mr16269
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Little is known about the ultrasonographic (US) features of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast because this entity usually manifests as pure mammographic calcifications and,is rarely evaluated with US. US findings were recorded in 70 patients with DCIS and;then analyzed and correlated with mammographic and histologic findings. A microlobulated mass with mild hypoechogenicity, ductal extension, and normal acoustic transmission was the most common US finding in DCIS. Spiculated margins, marked hypoechogenicity, a thick echogenic rim, and posterior acoustic shadowing at US often suggested the presence of invasion. US performed with a 10-13-MHz transducer and optimal technique can be used as a complement to mammography in detecting and evaluating DCIS of the breast, as it demonstrates breast lesions associated with malignant microcalcifications in most cases. The main benefit of identifying a US abnormality in women with mammographically detected DCIS is to allow the use of US to guide interventional procedures (eg, needle biopsy, needle localization). US may also be helpful in detecting DCIS without! calcifications and in evaluating disease extent in women with dense breasts. Nevertheless, further research is needed to delineate the role of US in the evaluation of patients with DCIS. (C)RSNA, 2002.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 280
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
*AJCC, 1997, AJCC CANC STAG MAN, P172
[2]   Multicentric and multifocal cancer: Whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation [J].
Berg, WA ;
Gilbreath, PL .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (01) :59-66
[3]  
BOYAGES J, 1993, HUM PATHOL, V24, P16
[4]   Incidental findings on sonography of the breast:: Clinical significance and diagnostic workup [J].
Buchberger, W ;
DeKoekkoek-Doll, P ;
Springer, P ;
Obrist, P ;
Dünser, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (04) :921-927
[5]   DUCTAL CARCINOMA INSITU - MAMMOGRAPHIC FINDINGS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS [J].
DERSHAW, DD ;
ABRAMSON, A ;
KINNE, DW .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (02) :411-415
[6]   Ductal carcinoma in situ - Implications for screening mammography [J].
Feig, SA .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 38 (04) :653-+
[7]   Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalcifications [J].
Gufler, H ;
Buitrago-Téllez, CH ;
Madjar, H ;
Allmann, KH ;
Uhl, M ;
Rohr-Reyes, A .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2000, 41 (03) :217-221
[8]   High detection rate of breast ductal carcinoma in situ calcifications on mammographically directed high-resolution sonography [J].
Hashimoto, BE ;
Kramer, DJ ;
Picozzi, VJ .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (05) :501-508
[9]   EXTENT, DISTRIBUTION, AND MAMMOGRAPHIC HISTOLOGICAL CORRELATIONS OF BREAST DUCTAL CARCINOMA INSITU [J].
HOLLAND, R ;
HENDRIKS, JHCL ;
VERBEEK, ALM ;
MRAVUNAC, M ;
STEKHOVEN, JHS .
LANCET, 1990, 335 (8688) :519-522
[10]  
HOLLAND R, 1994, SEMIN DIAGN PATHOL, V11, P167