Closing for the Benefit of Openness? The case of Wikimedia's open strategy process

被引:114
作者
Dobusch, Laura [1 ]
Dobusch, Leonhard [2 ]
Mueller-Seitz, Gordon [3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Gender & Divers, Radboud Social Cultural Res, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Innsbruck, Org, Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Univ Kaiserslautern, Dept Business Studies & Econ, Strategy Innovat & Cooperat, Kaiserslautern, Germany
关键词
decision-making; exclusion; inclusion; openness; participation; strategy-making; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE; OPEN INNOVATION; INCLUSION; BUREAUCRACY; DIVERSITY; ORGANIZATIONS; PARTICIPATION; TECHNOLOGY; DIMENSIONS; IDENTITY;
D O I
10.1177/0170840617736930
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A growing number of organizations subscribe to ideals of openness in areas such as innovation or strategy-making, supported by digital technologies and fuelled by promises of better outcomes and increased legitimacy. However, by applying a relational lens of inclusion and exclusion, we argue that, paradoxically, certain forms of closure may be necessary to achieve desired open qualities in strategy-making. Analysing the case of Wikimedia, which called for participation in a globally open strategy-making process, we show that openness regarding participation in crafting strategy content depends on certain forms of closure regarding procedures of the strategy-making process. Against this background, we propose a two-dimensional framework of openness, in which content-related and procedural openness are characterized by a combination of open and closed elements.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 370
页数:28
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive [J].
Adler, PS ;
Borys, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :61-89
[2]  
Ahmed S., 2012, On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life, DOI 10.2307/j.ctv1131d2g
[3]   Uncharted territories of organizational research:: The case of Karl!Popper's Open Society and Its Enemies [J].
Armbrüster, T ;
Gebert, D .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2002, 23 (02) :169-188
[4]   Professionalization as a Branding Activity: Occupational Identity and the Dialectic of Inclusivity-Exclusivity [J].
Ashcraft, Karen Lee ;
Muhr, Sara Louise ;
Rennstam, Jens ;
Sullivan, Katie .
GENDER WORK AND ORGANIZATION, 2012, 19 (05) :467-488
[5]   Organized dissonance: Feminist bureaucracy as hybrid form [J].
Ashcraft, KL .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 44 (06) :1301-1322
[6]   Crowdsourcing Strategizing: Communication Technology Affordances and the Communicative Constitution of Organizational Strategy [J].
Aten, Kathryn ;
Thomas, Gail Fann .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS COMMUNICATION, 2016, 53 (02) :148-180
[7]   Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation [J].
Baldwin, Carliss ;
von Hippel, Eric .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (06) :1399-1417
[8]   Social Media and the Emergence of Reflexiveness as a New Capability for Open Strategy [J].
Baptista, Joao ;
Wilson, Alexander D. ;
Galliers, Robert D. ;
Bynghall, Steve .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2017, 50 (03) :322-336
[9]   Inclusion is the Key to Diversity Management, but What is Inclusion? [J].
Barak, Michalle E. Mor .
HUMAN SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP & GOVERNANCE, 2015, 39 (02) :83-88
[10]   Developmental dynamics: Interagency collaboration as an emergent phenomenon [J].
Bardach, E .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2001, 11 (02) :149-164