Three-dimensional System Integration for HUD Placement on a New Tactical Airlift Platform: Design Eye Point vs. HUD Eye Box with Accommodation and Perceptual Implications

被引:6
作者
Harbour, Steven D. [1 ]
Hudson, Jeffery A. [2 ]
Zehner, Gregory F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aeronaut Syst Ctr, Dayton, OH 45377 USA
[2] Air Force Res Lab, Dayton, OH USA
来源
HEAD- AND HELMET-MOUNTED DISPLAYS XVII AND DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS FOR DEFENSE, SECURITY, AND AVIONICS VI | 2012年 / 8383卷
关键词
D O I
10.1117/12.920396
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The retrofitting of a cockpit with a Head-Up-Display (HUD) raises potential accommodation and perceptual issues for pilots that must be addressed. For maximum optical efficiency, the goal is to be able to place every pilot's eye into the HUD Eye Motion Box (EMB) given a seat adjustment range. Initially, the Eye Reference Point (ERP) of the EMB should theoretically be located on the aircraft's original cockpit Design Eye Point (DEP), but human postures vary, and HUD systems may not be optimally placed. In reality, there is a distribution of pilot eyes around the DEP (which is dominant eye dependent); therefore, this must be accounted for in order to obtain appropriate visibility of all of the symbology based on photonic characteristics of the HUD. Pilot size and postural variation need to be taken into consideration when positioning the HUD system to ensure proper vision of all HUD symbology in addition to meeting the basic physical accommodation requirements of the cockpit. The innovative process and data collection methods for maximizing accommodation and pilot perception on a new "tactical airlift" platform are discussed as well as the related neurocognitive factors and the effects of information display design on cognitive phenomena.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Air Force Flight Standards Agency, 2007, WHIT PAP PRIM FLIGHT
[2]  
Betancur J.A., 2011, AUGMENTED REALITY SO
[3]   TOWARD A THEORY OF SITUATION AWARENESS IN DYNAMIC-SYSTEMS [J].
ENDSLEY, MR .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1995, 37 (01) :32-64
[4]  
Flight Safety Foundation, 2009, HEAD UP GUID SYST TE
[5]  
Harbour S. D., 2012, 56 ANN M HUM FACT ER
[6]  
Hudson J.A., 2011, P 49 ANN S SAFE REN
[7]   Neuroergonomics: The brain in action and at work [J].
Parasuraman, Raja ;
Christensen, James ;
Grafton, Scott .
NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 59 (01) :1-3
[8]  
Tsang P.S., 2006, P HUM FACTORS ERGONO, V44, P3, DOI [10.1002/0470048204.ch9, DOI 10.1002/0470048204.CH9]
[9]  
Wickens C., 2008, Applied attention theory
[10]  
Wood R.B., 2001, The Avionics Handbook, p4