Green recovery or pollution rebound? Evidence from air pollution of China in the post-COVID-19 era

被引:21
作者
Feng, Tong [1 ,2 ]
Du, Huibin [2 ]
Lin, Zhongguo [2 ]
Chen, Xudong [1 ]
Chen, Zhenni [3 ]
Tu, Qiang [4 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Finance & Adm, Tianjin 300222, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian 710061, Peoples R China
[4] Tianjin Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Tianjin 300222, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Air pollution; Post-COVID-19; era; Production resumption; Control measure; China; METEOROLOGICAL NORMALIZATION; COVID-19; QUALITY; OZONE; TRENDS; IMPACT; URBAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116360
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the strict control measures, China has achieved phased victory in combating with the COVID-19, pro-duction activities have gradually returned to normal. This paper examined whether air pollution was rebounded or realized green recovery in the post-COVID-19 era with a dataset of weather normalized pollutant concen-trations using difference-in-differences models. Results showed that air pollution experienced a significant decline due to the wide range of control measures. With entering the post-epidemic period, air pollution raised due to the orderly production resumption. Specifically, production resumption increased the PM2.5 concentra-tions of lockdown cities and non-lockdown cities by 43.2% (22.3 mu g/m3) and 35.9% (17.3 mu g/m3) compared with that in the period of COVID-19 breakout. Although the economic activities of China have been gradually recovered, PM2.5 concentrations were 8.8-11.2 mu g/m3 lower than the level of pre-epidemic period. In addition, the environmental effects varied across cities. With the process of production resumption, the PM2.5 concen-trations of cities with higher GDP, higher secondary industry output, more private cars and higher export volume rebounded less. Most developed cities realized green recovery by economy growth and air quality improvement, such as Beijing and Shanghai. While cities with heavy industry reflected pollution rebound with slow economy recovery, such as Shenyang and Harbin. Understanding the environmental effects of control measure and pro-duction resumption can provide crucial information for developing epidemic recovery policies and dealing with pollution issues for both China and other countries.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Impact of the first induced COVID-19 lockdown on air quality in Israel [J].
Agami, Sarit ;
Dayan, Uri .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 262
[2]  
Aguas R, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-21134-2
[3]   Effect of large-scale social restriction (PSBB) during COVID-19 on outdoor air quality: Evidence from five cities in DKI Jakarta Province, Indonesia [J].
Anugerah, Adhe Rizky ;
Muttaqin, Prafajar Suksessanno ;
Purnama, Dwi Adi .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 197
[4]   Getting the unemployed back to work: The role of targeted wage subsidies [J].
Bell, B ;
Blundell, R ;
Van Reenen, J .
INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 1999, 6 (03) :339-360
[5]   On the effects of COVID-19 safer-at-home policies on social distancing, car crashes and pollution [J].
Brodeur, Abel ;
Cook, Nikolai ;
Wright, Taylor .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 106
[6]   The impact of macroeconomic uncertainty on non-financial firms' demand for liquidity [J].
Baum, Christopher F. ;
Caglayan, Mustafa ;
Ozkan, Neslihan ;
Talavera, Oleksandr .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 15 (04) :289-304
[7]  
Carslaw D., 2017, Worldmet: import surface meteorological data from NOAA integrated surface database (ISD)
[8]  
China National Environmental Monitoring Centre, 2021, NAT URB AIR QUAL REA
[9]  
Cicala S., 2020, EXPECTED HLTH EFFECT, pe27135
[10]   The Impact of the Wuhan Covid-19 Lockdown on Air Pollution and Health: A Machine Learning and Augmented Synthetic Control Approach [J].
Cole, Matthew A. ;
Elliott, Robert J. R. ;
Liu, Bowen .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2020, 76 (04) :553-580