Spatial and temporal research on ecological total factor energy efficiency in China: Based on "Ecology-Economy-Geography" heterogeneity framework

被引:13
作者
Lin, Xinyi [1 ]
Tang, Zhenpeng [2 ]
Long, Houyin [1 ]
机构
[1] Fuzhou Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecological total factor energy efficiency; Sequential directional SBM energy Distance; function; Emergy analysis; Luenberger productivity indicator; Meta-frontier; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; PRODUCTIVITY; LUENBERGER; REGIONS; INDUSTRY; PROGRESS; GROWTH; MODEL; SBM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134143
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Scientific measurement of energy efficiency is the cornerstone of improving energy efficiency and realizing energy transition. Considering that the production technology of each region is restrained by factors including economic development and natural resource endowment, this paper first uses the emergy theory to measure the ecological carrying capacity of each region, and then selects other representative data to construct the "Ecology-Economy-Geography" heterogeneous framework. From the perspective of energy input minimization, the spatial and temporal features of China's ecological total factor energy efficiency (ETFEE) from 2006 to 2019 have been discussed by employing the sequential directional SBM model and Luenberger productivity index. After robustness tests, we conclude that: (a) The grouping results under multidimensional variables are different from the traditional grouping of "East-Central-West"; (b) The meta-frontier Ecological Total Factor Energy Efficiency (METFEE) and group frontier Ecological Total Factor Energy Efficiency (GETFEE) vary in spatial distribution and temporal change; (c) Technological progress is the key to improving METFEE, but part of the improvement will be offset by diminishing returns of "catch-up effect". Finally, policy recommendations to promote the ecological total factor energy efficiency in China are put forward.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Monitoring changes in economy-wide energy efficiency: From energy-GDP ratio to composite efficiency index [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (05) :574-582
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, China Development Bank, P2020
[3]  
Chambers R.G., 1996, PAC ECON REV, V1, P181, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0106.1996.TB00184.X, 10.1111/j.1468-0106.1996.tb00184.x]
[4]   Efficiency and technology gap in China's agriculture: A regional meta-frontier analysis [J].
Chen, Zhuo ;
Song, Shunfeng .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 19 (02) :287-296
[5]   Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach [J].
Chung, YH ;
Fare, R ;
Grosskopf, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 51 (03) :229-240
[6]   Assessment of economic and ecological carrying capacity of agricultural crops in Nicaragua [J].
Cuadra, M. ;
Bjorklund, J. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2007, 7 (01) :133-149
[7]  
Du K.R., 2018, J. Environ. Econ, V3, P113
[8]   Sources of the potential CO2 emission reduction in China: A nonparametric metafrontier approach [J].
Du, Kerui ;
Huang, Lu ;
Yu, Kun .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 115 :491-501
[9]  
Du X., 2015, Eng. Sci, V17, P8
[10]   Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in African agriculture [J].
Nkamleu, GB .
AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-REVUE AFRICAINE DE DEVELOPPEMENT, 2004, 16 (01) :203-222