Parameter calibration and uncertainty estimation of a simple rainfall-runoff model in two case studies

被引:7
作者
Zhang, X. [1 ]
Hoermann, G. [1 ]
Fohrer, N. [1 ]
Gao, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kiel, Dept Hydrol & Water Resources Management, Ctr Ecol, Inst Conservat Nat Resources, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Nanjing Inst Geog & Limnol, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
hydrologic modeling; KIDS model; Kielstau in Germany; parameter uncertainty estimation; random sampling; XitaoXi in China; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PREDICTION UNCERTAINTY; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; HYDROLOGIC-MODELS; CATCHMENT; SIMULATION; SENSITIVITY; REDUCE;
D O I
10.2166/hydro.2012.084
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The simple rainfall-runoff conceptual KIDS (Kielstau Discharge Simulation) model using PCRaster is applied to simulate continuously daily discharge of the Kielstau and XitaoXi basins. This work focuses on parameter calibration procedure and, in particular, assessment of model prediction uncertainty. We employ a simplistic analysis routine SUFI-2, coupled with the implementation of a Monte Carlo based sampling strategy for the joint investigation of parameter calibration and uncertainty estimation. The scatter plots of model performance and parameter exhibit high equifinality of parameter sets in fitting observations, while their histogram distribution patterns imply that most parameters can be well defined. This study investigates parameter sensitivities and finds interesting local results: soil and groundwater parameters are more sensitive in Kielstau models than in XitaoXi models, and only the soil parameters 'S-fk' and 'K-c' are found strongly correlated. Finally, the uncertainty bounds are always thin and the global shape of the hydrograph is well approximated for both basins. As the validated uncertainty bounds also represent the desired coverage (P factor >50%) of the observations, and the calculated R factor values are in the targeted range (R factor < 1), it demonstrates the efficiency and suitability of this revised SUFI method for the two case studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1061 / 1074
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Abbaspour KC, 2004, VADOSE ZONE J, V3, P1340
[2]   Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment - Part 1: Model development [J].
Arnold, JG ;
Srinivasan, R ;
Muttiah, RS ;
Williams, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1998, 34 (01) :73-89
[3]   Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model predictions using observed binary pattern information within GLUE [J].
Aronica, G ;
Bates, PD ;
Horritt, MS .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 16 (10) :2001-2016
[4]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[5]   Comment on "Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: incoherence of the GLUE methodology" by Pietro Mantovan and Ezio Todini [J].
Beven, Keith ;
Smith, Paul ;
Freer, Jim .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 338 (3-4) :315-318
[7]   Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling [J].
Blasone, Roberta-Serena ;
Vrugt, Jasper A. ;
Madsen, Henrik ;
Rosbjerg, Dan ;
Robinson, Bruce A. ;
Zyvoloski, George A. .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2008, 31 (04) :630-648
[8]   Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods [J].
Boyle, DP ;
Gupta, HV ;
Sorooshian, S .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (12) :3663-3674
[9]   Using genetic algorithm and TOPSIS for Xinanjiang model calibration with a single procedure [J].
Cheng, CT ;
Zhao, MY ;
Chau, KW ;
Wu, XY .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 316 (1-4) :129-140
[10]   Combining a fuzzy optimal model with a genetic algorithm to solve multi-objective rainfall-runoff model calibration [J].
Cheng, CT ;
Ou, CP ;
Chau, KW .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2002, 268 (1-4) :72-86