General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:213
作者
Krogsboll, Lasse T. [1 ]
Jorgensen, Karsten Juhl [1 ]
Larsen, Christian Gronhoj [1 ]
Gotzsche, Peter C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Nord Cochrane Ctr, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2012年 / 345卷
关键词
SERVICES; PREVENTION; TRIALS; BORN; MEN;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.e7191
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To quantify the benefits and harms of general health checks in adults with an emphasis on patient-relevant outcomes such as morbidity and mortality rather than on surrogate outcomes. Design Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. For mortality, we analysed the results with random effects meta-analysis, and for other outcomes we did a qualitative synthesis as meta-analysis was not feasible. Data sources Medline, EMBASE, Healthstar, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, EPOC register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP, supplemented by manual searches of reference lists of included studies, citation tracking (Web of Knowledge), and contacts with trialists. Selection criteria Randomised trials comparing health checks with no health checks in adult populations unselected for disease or risk factors. Health checks defined as screening general populations for more than one disease or risk factor in more than one organ system. We did not include geriatric trials. Data extraction Two observers independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. We contacted authors for additional outcomes or trial details when necessary. Results We identified 16 trials, 14 of which had available outcome data (182 880 participants). Nine trials provided data on total mortality (11 940 deaths), and they gave a risk ratio of 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.03). Eight trials provided data on cardiovascular mortality (4567 deaths), risk ratio 1.03 (0.91 to 1.17), and eight on cancer mortality (3663 deaths), risk ratio 1.01 (0.92 to 1.12). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses did not alter these findings. We did not find beneficial effects of general health checks on morbidity, hospitalisation, disability, worry, additional physician visits, or absence from work, but not all trials reported on these outcomes. One trial found that health checks led to a 20% increase in the total number of new diagnoses per participant over six years compared with the control group and an increased number of people with self reported chronic conditions, and one trial found an increased prevalence of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia. Two out of four trials found an increased use of antihypertensives. Two out of four trials found small beneficial effects on self reported health, which could be due to bias. Conclusions General health checks did not reduce morbidity or mortality, neither overall nor for cardiovascular or cancer causes, although they increased the number of new diagnoses. Important harmful outcomes were often not studied or reported.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1977, International Journal of Epidemiology
[2]  
[Anonymous], WHO EUR COLL MULT PR
[3]   IMPACT OF A SCREENING PROGRAMME IN GENERAL PRACTICE - RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
BENNETT, AE ;
FRASER, IGP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1972, 1 (01) :55-60
[4]   Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Beswick, Andrew D. ;
Rees, Karen ;
Dieppe, Paul ;
Ayis, Salma ;
Gooberman-Hill, Rachael ;
Horwood, Jeremy ;
Ebrahim, Shah .
LANCET, 2008, 371 (9614) :725-735
[5]   Systematic review: The value of the periodic health evaluation [J].
Boulware, L. Ebony ;
Marinopoulos, Spyridon ;
Phillips, Karran A. ;
Hwang, Constance W. ;
Maynor, Kenric ;
Merenstein, Dan ;
Wilson, Renee F. ;
Barnes, George J. ;
Bass, Eric B. ;
Powe, Neil R. ;
Daumit, Gail L. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 146 (04) :289-300
[6]  
COULTER A, 1995, BRIT MED J, V310, P1099
[7]   Surrogate end points in clinical trials: Are we being misled? [J].
Fleming, TR ;
DeMets, DL .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 125 (07) :605-613
[8]   MULTIPHASIC HEALTH CHECK-UP EVALUATION - A 16-YEAR FOLLOW-UP [J].
FRIEDMAN, GD ;
COLLEN, MF ;
FIREMAN, BH .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1986, 39 (06) :453-463
[9]   Historical changes in the objectives of the periodic health examination [J].
Han, PKJ .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 127 (10) :910-917
[10]  
Holland W., 2009, Eurohealth, V15, P16