Energy analysis-based core drilling method for the prediction of rock uniaxial compressive strength

被引:4
作者
Qi, Wang [1 ,2 ]
Shuo, Xu [1 ,2 ]
Ke, Gao Hong [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Zhang [1 ,2 ]
Bei, Jiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hong, Liu Bo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, State Key Lab Geomech & Deep Underground Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Res Ctr Geotech & Struct Engn, Jinan 250061, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Jinan, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Jinan 250022, Peoples R China
关键词
core drilling; energy analysis; drilling parameter; rock; uniaxial compressive strength; relationship model; prediction method; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; FAILURE-MECHANISM; TENSILE-STRENGTH; JOINT ROUGHNESS; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.12989/gae.2020.23.1.061
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rock is a basic parameter in underground engineering design. The disadvantages of this commonly employed laboratory testing method are untimely testing, difficulty in performing core testing of broken rock mass and long and complicated onsite testing processes. Therefore, the development of a fast and simple in situ rock UCS testing method for field use is urgent. In this study, a multi-function digital rock drilling and testing system and a digital core bit dedicated to the system are independently developed and employed in digital drilling tests on rock specimens with different strengths. The energy analysis is performed during rock cutting to estimate the energy consumed by the drill bit to remove a unit volume of rock. Two quantitative relationship models of energy analysis-based core drilling parameters (ECD) and rock UCS (ECD-UCS models) are established in this manuscript by the methods of regression analysis and support vector machine (SVM). The predictive abilities of the two models are comparatively analysed. The results show that the mean value of relative difference between the predicted rock UCS values and the UCS values measured by the laboratory uniaxial compression test in the prediction set are 3.76 MPa and 4.30 MPa, respectively, and the standard deviations are 2.08 MPa and 4.14 MPa, respectively. The regression analysis-based ECD-UCS model has a more stable predictive ability. The energy analysis-based rock drilling method for the prediction of UCS is proposed. This method realized the quick and convenient in situ test of rock UCS.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 69
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV
[2]   Investigation of the failure mode of shale rocks in biaxial and triaxial compression tests [J].
Arora, Shrey ;
Mishra, Brijes .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2015, 79 :109-123
[3]   A tutorial on Support Vector Machines for pattern recognition [J].
Burges, CJC .
DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 1998, 2 (02) :121-167
[4]   Change of pore structure and uniaxial compressive strength of sandstone under electrochemical coupling [J].
Chai, Zhaoyun ;
Bai, Jinbo ;
Sun, Yaohui .
GEOMECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 17 (02) :157-164
[5]  
Cristianini N, 2000, SUPPORT VECTOR MACHI, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511801389
[6]   Development of a geological model for chargeability assessment of borehole using drill monitoring technique [J].
Ghosh, Rajib ;
Gustafson, Anna ;
Schunnesson, Hakan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2018, 109 :9-18
[7]   Predicting the Uniaxial Compressive and Tensile Strengths of Gypsum Rock by Point Load Testing [J].
Heidari, M. ;
Khanlari, G. R. ;
Kaveh, Mehdi Torabi ;
Kargarian, S. .
ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2012, 45 (02) :265-273
[8]  
[黄为勇 HUANG Wei-yong], 2009, [中国矿业大学学报. 自然科学版, Journal of China University of Mining & Technology], V38, P234
[9]   Electrical resistivity measurement to predict uniaxial compressive and tensile strength of igneous rocks [J].
Kahraman, Sair ;
Yeken, Tekin .
BULLETIN OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2010, 33 (06) :731-735
[10]   Estimating rock strength parameters using drilling data [J].
Kalantari, Sajjad ;
Hashemolhosseini, Hamid ;
Baghbanan, Alireza .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2018, 104 :45-52