Minimally Invasive Sinus Augmentation Procedure Using a Dedicated Hydraulic Sinus Lift Implant Device: A Prospective Case Series Study on Clinical, Radiologic, and Patient-Centered Outcomes

被引:20
作者
Tallarico, Marco [1 ]
Meloni, Silvio Mario [1 ]
Xhanari, Erta
Pisano, Milena
Cochran, David L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Sassari, Dent Unit, Sassari, Italy
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Periodont, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
FLOOR ELEVATION; MAXILLARY; TRIAL; GUIDELINES; PLACEMENT; OSTEOTOME; BONE;
D O I
10.11607/prd.2914
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes of a novel device that allows simultaneous hydraulic sinus membrane elevation, bone grafting, and implant placement. A sample of 18 consecutive participants with severe atrophy of the posterior maxilla underwent transcrestal elevation of the sinus membrane and implant placement. At the 6-month follow-up, the following parameters were assessed: implant success, any complications, marginal bone loss (MBL), threedimensional (3D) graft measurements, implant stability quotient (ISQ), and graft density. No implants failed during follow-up (10.8 +/- 2.8 months; range: 7-14 months). No membrane tears or other adverse events were observed. Mean residual alveolar ridge height was 4.78 +/- 0.88 mm(2). Six months after the procedure, the mean MBL was 0.18 mm(2). The mean sinus membrane elevation was 12.78 +/- 2.18 mm(2) (range: 10.7-14.23). Along the basic 3D reference planes, the dimensions of grafted bone measured around implants were as follows: axial area = 239.7 +/- 5768 mm(2); sagittal area = 2570 +/- 60.83 mm(2); coronal area = 143.3 +/- 29.46 mm(2). The mean volume of the graft was 2.38 +/- 0.26 mL at baseline and 2.05 +/- 0.24 mL 6 months after graft maturation (difference: 0.33 +/- 0.29 mL, P =.0090). Graft density (in Hounsfield units [HU]), improved during healing from 322.0 +/- 100.42 HU to 1,062.0 +/- 293.7 HU; difference 740.0 +/- 295.35 HU (P =.0001). The mean ISQ value was 65.5 at implant placement, and it increased to 74.1 at the 6-month examination (P =.0014). Of 18 patients, 12 experienced no pain (66.6%) and 10 experienced no swelling (55.5%). No severe pain or swelling was reported in any of the cases. The mean number of analgesic tablets consumed was 0.78 +/- 0.67 Mean surgical time was 24.0 +/- 4.07 minutes. The iRaise Sinus Lift System may provide a new option for minimally invasive transcrestal sinus surgery with minimal patient discomfort. A physiologic contraction of 13.9% of its original volume was experienced during healing. Long-term clinical studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 135
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Reamer-mediated transalveolar sinus floor elevation without osteotome and simultaneous implant placement in the maxillary molar area: clinical outcomes of 391 implants in 380 patients [J].
Ahn, Sang-Hoon ;
Park, Eun-Jin ;
Kim, Eun-Suk .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (07) :866-872
[2]   Minimally Invasive Sinus Lift Implant Device: A Multicenter Safety and Efficacy Trial Preliminary Results [J].
Better, Hadar ;
Slavescu, Dragos ;
Barbu, Horia ;
Cochran, David L. ;
Chaushu, Gabi .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (04) :520-526
[3]   Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation: A Retrospective Study of 46 Patients up to 16 Years [J].
Bruschi, Giovanni B. ;
Crespi, Roberto ;
Cappare, Paolo ;
Gherlone, Enrico .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (05) :759-767
[4]  
Calin C, 2014, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V29, P558, DOI 10.11607/jomi.3206
[5]   How Accurate Is CBCT in Measuring Bone Density? A Comparative CBCT-CT In Vitro Study [J].
Cassetta, Michele ;
Stefanelli, Luigi Vito ;
Pacifici, Andrea ;
Pacifici, Luciano ;
Barbato, Ersilia .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (04) :471-478
[6]   Sinus augmentation via transcrestal approach: a comparison between the balloon and osteotome technique in a cadaver study [J].
Chan, Hsun-Liang ;
Oh, Tae-Ju ;
Fu, Jia-Hui ;
Benavides, Erika ;
Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo ;
Wang, Hom-Lay .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (09) :985-990
[7]   An 8-year retrospective study: 1,100 patients receiving 1,557 implants using the minimally invasive hydraulic sinus condensing technique [J].
Chen, L ;
Cha, J .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 76 (03) :482-491
[8]  
Chiapasco M, 2009, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V24, P237
[9]   Histomorphometric outcomes after lateral sinus floor elevation procedure: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis [J].
Corbella, Stefano ;
Taschieri, Silvio ;
Weinstein, Roberto ;
Del Fabbro, Massimo .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (09) :1106-1122
[10]  
Cosci F, 2000, Implant Dent, V9, P363, DOI 10.1097/00008505-200009040-00014