Why Aren't Advanced High-Strength Steels More Widely Used? Stakeholder Preferences and Perceived Barriers to New Materials

被引:7
作者
Alriksson, Stina [1 ]
Henningsson, Marianne [1 ]
机构
[1] Linnaeus Univ, S-39182 Kalmar, Sweden
关键词
advanced high-strength steels (AHSS); conjoint analysis; material choice; industrial ecology; light weighting; stakeholders; SUSTAINABILITY; INDUSTRY; DESIGN; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12212
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Advanced high-strength steels may reduce the use of nonrenewable resources and energy given that the amount of material needed is smaller, compared to traditional steel grades. Still, advanced steel grades are not utilized to the extent that could be expected. This study examines stakeholders' preferences of steel characteristics and perceived barriers to the introduction of new materials. Focus group interviews were used to identify steel characteristics and perceived barriers. Stakeholder preferences of steel characteristics were evaluated through a conjoint analysis; the results showed that low weight was given the highest priority, followed by high impact strength and low price. Low chromium content was the steel characteristic of least interest. Perceived barriers to the introduction of high-strength steel were categorized as technical barriers, knowledge barriers, scrap management barriers, suitability barriers, and cost barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 655
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Steel industry environmental objectives: stakeholder preference assessment using conjoint analysis [J].
Alriksson, S. ;
Grip, C. -E. .
IRONMAKING & STEELMAKING, 2013, 40 (08) :605-612
[2]   Conjoint analysis for environmental evaluation a review of methods and applications [J].
Alriksson, Stina ;
Oberg, Tomas .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2008, 15 (03) :244-257
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ISO 26000:2010
[4]  
[Anonymous], 140632006 ISO
[5]   Annoyance and Worry in a Petrochemical Industrial Area-Prevalence, Time Trends and Risk Indicators [J].
Axelsson, Gosta ;
Stockfelt, Leo ;
Andersson, Eva ;
Gidlof-Gunnarsson, Anita ;
Sallsten, Gerd ;
Barregard, Lars .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 10 (04) :1418-1438
[6]   A SIMPLE-MODEL OF HERD BEHAVIOR [J].
BANERJEE, AV .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1992, 107 (03) :797-817
[7]  
Box G. E., 2005, Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation, and Discovery, V2nd
[8]  
Bryman A., 2016, Social Research Methods, V5th
[9]   Valuing enhancements to forest recreation using choice experiment and contingent behaviour methods [J].
Christie, Michael ;
Hanley, Nick ;
Hynes, Stephen .
JOURNAL OF FOREST ECONOMICS, 2007, 13 (2-3) :75-102
[10]   Valuing the diversity of biodiversity [J].
Christie, Mike ;
Hanley, Nick ;
Warren, John ;
Murphy, Kevin ;
Wright, Robert ;
Hyde, Tony .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 58 (02) :304-317