Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Identification of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From the REDECT Trial

被引:169
作者
Divgi, Chaitanya R. [1 ]
Uzzo, Robert G. [3 ]
Gatsonis, Constantine [4 ]
Bartz, Roman [5 ]
Treutner, Silke [5 ]
Yu, Jian Qin [3 ]
Chen, David [3 ]
Carrasquillo, Jorge A. [2 ]
Larson, Steven [2 ]
Bevan, Paul [5 ]
Russo, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Nucl Med PET, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[4] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[5] Wilex, Munich, Germany
关键词
POSTOPERATIVE PROGNOSTIC NOMOGRAM; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; CORE BIOPSY; HISTOLOGIC SUBTYPES; CLINICAL MANAGEMENT; MASS; ACCURACY; TUMORS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2011.41.2445
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose A clinical study to characterize renal masses with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was undertaken. Patients and Methods This was an open-label multicenter study of iodine-124 (I-124) -girentuximab PET/CT in patients with renal masses who were scheduled for resection. PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) of the abdomen were performed 2 to 6 days after intravenous I-124-girentuximab administration and before resection of the renal mass(es). Images were interpreted centrally by three blinded readers for each imaging modality. Tumor histology was determined by a blinded central pathologist. The primary end points-average sensitivity and specificity for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)-were compared between the two modalities. Agreement between and within readers was assessed. Results I-124-girentuximab was well tolerated. In all, 195 patients had complete data sets (histopathologic diagnosis and PET/CT and CECT results) available. The average sensitivity was 86.2% (95% CI, 75.3% to 97.1%) for PET/CT and 75.5% (95% CI, 62.6% to 88.4%) for CECT (P = .023). The average specificity was 85.9% (95% CI, 69.4% to 99.9%) for PET/CT and 46.8% (95% CI, 18.8% to 74.7%) for CECT (P = .005). Inter-reader agreement was high (kappa range, 0.87 to 0.92 for PET/CT; 0.67 to 0.76 for CECT), as was intrareader agreement (range, 87% to 100% for PET/CT; 73.7% to 91.3% for CECT). Conclusion This study represents (to the best of our knowledge) the first clinical validation of a molecular imaging biomarker for malignancy. I-124-girentuximab PET/CT can accurately and noninvasively identify ccRCC, with potential utility for designing best management approaches for patients with renal masses. J Clin Oncol 31:187-194. (C) 2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 194
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] PET/CT imaging of clear cell renal cell carcinoma with I-124 labeled chimeric antibody
    Bahnson, Eamonn E.
    Murrey, Douglas A., Jr.
    Mojzisik, Cathy M.
    Hall, Nathan C.
    Martinez-Suarez, Humberto J.
    Knopp, Michael V.
    Martin, Edward W., Jr.
    Povoski, Stephen P.
    Bahnson, Robert R.
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2009, 1 (02) : 67 - 70
  • [2] Iodine-124 as a Label for Pharmacological PET Imaging
    Belov, Vasily V.
    Bonab, Ali A.
    Fischman, Alan J.
    Heartlein, Michael
    Calias, Pericles
    Papisov, Mikhail I.
    [J]. MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS, 2011, 8 (03) : 736 - 747
  • [3] Managing Incidental Findings on Abdominal CT: White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee
    Berland, Lincoln L.
    Silverman, Stuart G.
    Gore, Richard M.
    Mayo-Smith, William W.
    Megibow, Alec J.
    Yee, Judy
    Brink, James A.
    Baker, Mark E.
    Federle, Michael P.
    Foley, W. Dennis
    Francis, Isaac R.
    Herts, Brian R.
    Israel, Gary M.
    Krinsky, Glenn
    Platt, Joel F.
    Shuman, William P.
    Taylor, Andrew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 7 (10) : 754 - 773
  • [4] Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma
    Cheville, JC
    Lohse, CM
    Zincke, H
    Weaver, AL
    Blute, ML
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2003, 27 (05) : 612 - 624
  • [5] PET-based estradiol challenge as a predictive biomarker of response to endocrine therapy in women with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer
    Dehdashti, Farrokh
    Mortimer, Joanne E.
    Trinkaus, Kathryn
    Naughton, Michael J.
    Ellis, Matthew
    Katzenellenbogen, John A.
    Welch, Michael J.
    Siegel, Barry A.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 113 (03) : 509 - 517
  • [6] Preoperative characterisation of clear-cell renal carcinoma using iodine-124-labelled antibody chimeric G250 (124I-cG250) and PET in patients with renal masses:: a phase I trial
    Divgi, Chaitanya R.
    Pandit-Taskar, Neeta
    Jungbluth, Achim A.
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Gonen, Mithat
    Ruan, Shutian
    Pierre, Christine
    Nagel, Andrew
    Pryma, Daniel A.
    Humm, John
    Larson, Steven M.
    Old, Lloyd J.
    Russo, Paul
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (04) : 304 - 310
  • [7] Eble J., 2004, WHO CLASSIFICATION T
  • [8] The Problem is Background, not Signal
    Frangioni, John V.
    [J]. MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2009, 8 (06): : 303 - 304
  • [9] Solid renal tumors: An analysis of pathological features related to tumor size
    Frank, I
    Blute, ML
    Cheville, JC
    Lohse, CM
    Weaver, AL
    Zincke, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) : 2217 - 2220
  • [10] Small Renal Mass
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Aron, Monish
    Gervais, Debra A.
    Jewett, Michael A. S.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (07) : 624 - 634