Screening mammography: Do women prefer a higher recall rate given the possibility of earlier detection of cancer?

被引:52
作者
Ganott, MA [1 ]
Sumkin, JH [1 ]
King, JL [1 ]
Klym, AH [1 ]
Catullo, VJ [1 ]
Cohen, CS [1 ]
Gur, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2383050852
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To prospectively survey women under-going screening mammography to assess their attitudes toward and preference rot, the level of recall rates given the possibility that an increase in recall rates may result in earlier detection of cancer. Materials and Methods This HWAA-compliant survey was performed with an institutional review board-approved protocol. Women who arrived for their routine screening mammographic examination from November 2004 to March 2005 were informed before they consented to participate. The distribution of responses rot, each survey question was summarized, and proportions for the entire group and different subgroups were computed. The z score statistic was used to assess significant differences between subgroups. Results: Fifteen hundred seventy anonymized questionnaires were collected; 1171 (75%) were from women between 40 and 59 years or age. Of 1528 respondents, 1486 (97%) believed that a false-positive result would not deter them front continuing With regular screening. and Most would have been willing to be recalled more often for either a noninvasive (86% [1308 of 1519 respondents]) or an invasive (82% [1248 of 1515 respondents]) procedure if it might increase the chance of detecting a cancer (if present) earlier. Compared with respondents undergoing their initial screening mammographic examination, women who had undergone at least one prior screening examination reported that they were more likely to continue with screening if they had received a previous false-positive result (P =.02). Women younger than 60 years and those previously recalled were more willing to be called back more often for a noninvasive or, when indicated, an invasive procedure (P <.05). Conclusion: A substantial fraction of women in this study would have preferred the inconvenience of and anxiety associated with a higher recall rate if it resulted in the possibility of detecting breast cancer earlier.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 800
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Perceived sensitivity of mammographic screening: women's views on test accuracy and financial compensation for missed cancers [J].
Barratt, A ;
Cockburn, J ;
Furnival, C ;
McBride, A ;
Mallon, L .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1999, 53 (11) :716-720
[2]  
BASSETT LW, 1994, AHCPR PUBLICATION
[3]   Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation [J].
Beam, CA ;
Conant, EF ;
Sickles, EA .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (04) :282-290
[4]   Misconceptions about efficacy of mammography screening: a public health dilemma [J].
Chamot, E ;
Perneger, TV .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2001, 55 (11) :799-803
[5]  
Davey Heather M, 2002, Health Expect, V5, P330, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00194.x
[6]   International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs [J].
Elmore, JG ;
Nakano, CY ;
Koepsell, TD ;
Desnick, LM ;
D'Orsi, CJ ;
Ransohoff, DF .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (18) :1384-1393
[7]   VARIABILITY IN RADIOLOGISTS INTERPRETATIONS OF MAMMOGRAMS [J].
ELMORE, JG ;
WELLS, CK ;
LEE, CH ;
HOWARD, DH ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (22) :1493-1499
[8]  
Elmore JG, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1373
[9]   Economic challenges in breast imaging - A survivor's guide to success [J].
Feig, SA .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 38 (04) :843-+
[10]   Recall and detection rates in screening mammography - A review of clinical experience - Implications for practice guidelines [J].
Gur, D ;
Sumkin, JH ;
Hardesty, LA ;
Clearfield, RJ ;
Cohen, CS ;
Ganott, MA ;
Hakim, CM ;
Harris, KM ;
Poller, WR ;
Shah, R ;
Wallace, LP ;
Rockette, HE .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (08) :1590-1594