Delay Analysis Selection Model for a Construction Project

被引:3
作者
Yang, Juneseok [1 ]
Arditi, David [1 ]
Lee, Dong-Eun [2 ]
Mutis, Ivan [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
[2] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Architecture Civil Environm & Energy, Daegu, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Delay analysis; Delay claims; Construction projects; Decision support system; Similarity assessment; Litigation of delay-related disputes; COST OVERRUNS; TIME; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s12205-022-2394-1
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The decision to use static, dynamic, additive, or subtractive delay analysis is critical because making the wrong decision may have serious undesired consequences. As a response to this problem, a delay analysis selection (DAS) model was developed that identifies the most appropriate type of delay analysis for a target case. The model constitutes the first step of a two-step process to perform delay analysis. It involves a case-base that is populated by 3,776 possible cases developed by using combinations of 26 attributes that were found in the literature to influence the selection of the most appropriate type of delay analysis. The 26 attributes were organized in 7 categories. The weights of the attributes and the categories were calculated using the entropy method. The DAS model finds the best match between a target case and one of the cases stored in the case-base by performing weighted case similarity assessment. The type of delay analysis that is indicated in the matched case is adopted for use in the target case. This study is the first attempt to automate the selection of the most appropriate type of delay analysis. Once the most suitable type of delay analysis is identified in the first step, it is immediately performed in the second step.
引用
收藏
页码:4926 / 4941
页数:16
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Factors influencing the selection of delay analysis methods in construction projects in UAE
    Abdelhadi, Yazeed
    Dulaimi, Mohammed Fadhil
    Bajracharya, Arun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19 (04) : 329 - 340
  • [2] Importance and ranking evaluation of delay factors for development construction projects in Benin
    Akogbe, Romuald-Kokou T. M.
    Feng, Xin
    Zhou, Jing
    [J]. KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2013, 17 (06) : 1213 - 1222
  • [3] Alkass S., 1996, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V14, P375, DOI DOI 10.1080/014461996373250
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, MORGANTI NATL INC US
  • [5] Selecting a delay analysis method in resolving construction claims
    Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Construction Engineering and Management Program, 3201 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL 60616, United States
    [J]. Int. J. Proj. Manage., 2006, 2 (145-155): : 145 - 155
  • [6] Analysis methods in time-based claims
    Arditi, David
    Pattanakitchamroon, Thanat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2008, 134 (04): : 242 - 252
  • [7] Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA), 2003, CONT ADV SYST INC NO
  • [8] Understanding the underlying reasons behind time overruns of government building projects in Ghana
    Asiedu, Richard O.
    Alfen, Hans W.
    [J]. KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2016, 20 (06) : 2103 - 2111
  • [9] Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International AACEI, 2011, AACE INT REC PRACT 2, P9
  • [10] Avalon A, 2017, CHOOSING MOST APPROP