Implementation Determinants of Knowledge Mobilization within a Quebec Municipality to Improve Universal Accessibility

被引:2
作者
Corcuff, Maelle [1 ,2 ]
Routhier, Francois [1 ,2 ]
Gamache, Stephanie [1 ]
Fiset, David [1 ]
Leblond, Jean [1 ]
Lamontagne, Marie-Eve [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Integre Univ Sante & Serv Sociaux La Capitale, Ctr Interdisciplinary Res Rehabil & Social Integr, 525 Boul Wilfrid Hamel, Quebec City, PQ G1M 2S8, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Rehabil Dept, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
基金
加拿大魁北克医学研究基金会;
关键词
universal accessibility; human rights; municipality; local government; Convention on Rights of People with Disabilities; knowledge mobilization; INTERVENTIONS; COMPONENTS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph192214651
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
According to the UN-CRPD, cities must develop action plans about universal accessibility (UA). Operationalization of these plans is complex, and little is known about what municipal employees know about UA. Aim: The aim is to document implementation determinants of UA within a municipal organization in Quebec, Canada. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was performed. Employees answered a survey based on the TDF and the DIBQ. Facilitators, barriers, and factors influencing the determinants were identified. Results: A total of 43% of the employees completed the survey. The implementation of UA measures is more facilitated by their beliefs about the impact on citizens, while the external context hinders the proper implementation. It is also influenced by six factors: (1) professional role, (2) capacity, (3) resources, (4) willingness, (5) characteristics, and (6) feedback. Discussion: Results suggest that understanding the consequences, sufficient resources, abilities, and willingness can influence implementation of UA. Conclusion: These findings have informed the objectives of the next action plan of the municipal organization and could guide the development of solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] The equitable use concept in sidewalk design
    Aghaabbasi, Mahdi
    Moeinaddini, Mehdi
    Asadi-Shekari, Zohreh
    Shah, Muhammad Zaly
    [J]. CITIES, 2019, 88 : 181 - 190
  • [2] Human Rights and the City: A View From Canada
    Agrawal, Sandeep
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2021, 87 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities
  • [4] A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems
    Atkins, Lou
    Francis, Jill
    Islam, Rafat
    O'Connor, Denise
    Patey, Andrea
    Ivers, Noah
    Foy, Robbie
    Duncan, Eilidh M.
    Colquhoun, Heather
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Lawton, Rebecca
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
  • [5] Fast tracking the design of theory-based KT interventions through a consensus process
    Bussieres, Andre E.
    Al Zoubi, Fadi
    Quon, Jeffrey A.
    Ahmed, Sara
    Thomas, Aliki
    Stuber, Kent
    Sajko, Sandy
    French, Simon
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 10
  • [6] Corbiere M.et., 2020, Methodes qualitatives, quantitatives et mixtes: dans la recherche en sciences humaines, sociales et de la sante, V2e
  • [7] Are communities in the United States planning for pedestrians with disabilities? Findings from a systematic evaluation of local government barrier removal plans
    Eisenberg, Yochai
    Heider, Amy
    Gould, Rob
    Jones, Robin
    [J]. CITIES, 2020, 102
  • [8] What influences practitioners' readiness to deliver psychological interventions by telephone? A qualitative study of behaviour change using the Theoretical Domains Framework
    Faija, Cintia L.
    Connell, Janice
    Welsh, Charlotte
    Ardern, Kerry
    Hopkin, Elinor
    Gellatly, Judith
    Rushton, Kelly
    Fraser, Claire
    Irvine, Annie
    Armitage, Christopher J.
    Wilson, Paul
    Bower, Peter
    Lovell, Karina
    Bee, Penny
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [9] Fasciglione M., 2017, UN CONV RIGHTS PERS, P375, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43790-3_24
  • [10] ACCESSIBILITY FOR USE AND ACCESSIBILITY IN USE
    Folcher, V.
    Lompre, N.
    [J]. TRAVAIL HUMAIN, 2012, 75 (01): : 89 - 120