ASSESSMENT OF PIPELINE SPIRAL WELD CRACKS SUBJECTED TO INTERNAL PRESSURE

被引:0
|
作者
Neuert, Mark C. [1 ]
Dessein, Thomas J. [1 ]
Sen, Millan [2 ]
机构
[1] C FER Technol 1999 Inc, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Enbridge Pipelines Inc, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 1 | 2018年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Spirally welded pipelines can make up significant portions of operator transmission systems, and may contain manufacturing anomalies that are susceptible to fatigue growth. Modifications to inputs of crack assessment models, such as CorLAS, are required to account for the angle these cracks make with respect to the longitudinal pipe axis, given that these crack assessment models were developed for longitudinally orientated cracks. Two such modifications were investigated and are discussed in this paper. One approach considered the normal stress component perpendicular to the angled crack, for which a stress transformation calculator was developed. Another approach, adapted from API 579 and BS7910 standards, used an effective crack length calculated as the longitudinal projection of the full length of an angled crack. Failure pressures calculated using these approaches were compared to validated finite element (FE) results. For both modifications, the pressure capacity increased for angled cracks versus longitudinal cracks. The transformed normal stress approach resulted in non-conservative failure pressure predictions with respect to the FE models, whereas the modified crack length approach was conservative. Additionally, the extended finite element method (XFEM) was used to investigate the propagation behavior of angled cracks. It was found that the general tendency was for propagation parallel to the longitudinal pipe axis; however, when considering weld residual stresses, the crack propagation would be directed toward the direction of the spiral seam.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Failure Analysis of ERW Seam Weld Pipeline in Internal Pressure
    Wang, Rui
    Li, Dongfeng
    Yang, Peng
    Han, Jun
    Han, Xinli
    ECO-MATERIALS PROCESSING AND DESIGN XIII, 2012, 724 : 464 - 467
  • [2] Analysis of spiral weld cracking at pipeline
    Zhang, Qian
    Dou, Ying-Ting
    Zhang, Zheng
    Cailiao Rechuli Xuebao/Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2013, 34 (07): : 112 - 117
  • [3] Interactions of two collinear circular hole cracks subjected to internal pressure
    Miao, Changqing
    Wei, Yintao
    Yan, Xiangqiao
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2013, 223 : 216 - 224
  • [4] BENDING CAPACITY OF CORRODED PIPELINE SUBJECTED TO INTERNAL PRESSURE AND AXIAL LOADINGS
    Gao, Jie
    Peng, Zengli
    Li, Xin
    Zhou, Jing
    Zhou, Wenxing
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 37TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, 2018, VOL 3, 2018,
  • [5] INTERNAL LINING OF PIPELINE WELD JOINTS
    CARLSON, RE
    MATERIALS PERFORMANCE, 1992, 31 (09) : 46 - 49
  • [6] RESEARCH ON BURST TESTS OF PIPELINE WITH SPIRAL WELD DEFECTS
    Chen, Jian
    Feng, Qingshan
    Wang, Fuxiang
    Zhang, Hailiang
    Song, Hancheng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE - 2012, VOL 3, 2013, : 53 - 60
  • [7] Residual strength analysis of pipeline with circumferential groove corrosion subjected to internal pressure
    Arumugam, Thibankumar
    Karuppanan, Saravanan
    Ovinis, Mark
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 29 : 88 - 93
  • [8] Prediction of burst pressure of corroded thin-walled pipeline elbows subjected to internal pressure
    Gong, Changqing
    Guo, Shihua
    Zhang, Rui
    Frangopol, Dan M.
    THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 2024, 199
  • [9] Assessment of internal pressure effect, causing additional bending of the pipeline
    Baktizin, Ramil N.
    Zaripov, Rail M.
    Korobkow, Gennadii K.
    Masalimov, Radik B.
    JOURNAL OF MINING INSTITUTE, 2020, 242 (02): : 160 - 168
  • [10] Cracks emanating from a rhombus hole in infinite and finite plate subjected to internal pressure
    Yan, Xiangqiao
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2007, 14 (04) : 548 - 556