Face validity, construct validity and training benefits of a virtual reality turp simulator

被引:42
作者
Bright, Elizabeth [1 ]
Vine, Samuel [2 ]
Wilson, Mark R. [2 ]
Masters, Rich S. W. [3 ]
McGrath, John S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Fdn Trust, Exeter Surg Hlth Serv Res Unit, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Coll Life & Environm Sci, Exeter EX1 2LU, Devon, England
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Inst Human Performance, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
TURP; Validity; Virtual reality; Simulation; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; VALIDATION; SKILLS; ACQUISITION; PERFORMANCE; RESIDENTS; SURGERY; UROLOGY; MODEL; VR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.02.012
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess face validity, construct validity and the training benefits of a virtual reality TURP simulator. Method: 11 novices (no TURP experience) and 7 experts (>200 TURP's) completed a virtual reality median lobe prostate resection task on the TURPsim (TM) (Simbionix USA Corp., Cleveland, OH). Performance indicators (percentage of prostate resected (PR), percentage of capsular resection (CR) and time diathermy loop active without tissue contact (TAWC) were recorded via the TURPsim (TM) and compared between novices and experts to assess construct validity. Verbal comments provided by experts following task completion were used to assess face validity. Repeated attempts of the task by the novices were analysed to assess the training benefits of the TURPsim (TM). Results: Experts resected a significantly greater percentage of prostate per minute (p < 0.01) and had significantly less active diathermy time without tissue contact (p < 0.01) than novices. After practice, novices were able to perform the simulation more effectively, with significant improvement in all measured parameters. Improvement in performance was noted in novices following repetitive training, as evidenced by improved TAWC scores that were not significantly different from the expert group (p = 0.18). Conclusions: This study has established face and construct validity for the TURPsim (TM). The potential benefit in using this tool to train novices has also been demonstrated. (c) 2012 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 166
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Virtual reality-assisted robotic surgery simulation [J].
Albani, Justin M. ;
Lee, David I. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (03) :285-287
[2]  
Cumpanas A, 2004, TIMISOARA MED J, V54, P159
[3]   Is the ability to perform transurethral resection of the prostate influenced by the surgeon's previous experience? [J].
Cury, Jose ;
Coelho, Rafael Ferreira ;
Bruschini, Homero ;
Srougi, Miguel .
CLINICS, 2008, 63 (03) :315-320
[4]   External Validation of a Virtual Reality Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Simulator [J].
Hudak, Steven J. ;
Landt, Cristy L. ;
Hernandez, Javier ;
Soderdahl, Douglas W. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (05) :2018-2022
[5]   Construct Validity of a Full Procedure, Virtual Reality, Real-Time, Simulation Model for Training in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate [J].
Kaellstroem, Reidar ;
Hjertberg, Hans ;
Svanvik, Joar .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (01) :109-115
[6]   Impact of Virtual Reality-Simulated Training on Urology Residents' Performance of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate [J].
Kallstrom, Reidar ;
Hjertberg, Hans ;
Svanvik, Joar .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (09) :1521-1528
[7]   A computer assisted surgical trainer for transurethral resection of the prostate [J].
Kumar, PVS ;
Gomes, MPSF ;
Davies, BL ;
Timoney, AG .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (05) :2111-2114
[8]   Validation of surgical simulators [J].
McDougall, Elspeth M. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (03) :244-247
[9]   Virtual reality: Surgical application - Challenge for the new millennium [J].
Meier, AH ;
Rawn, CL ;
Krummel, TM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2001, 192 (03) :372-384
[10]  
NHS Information Centre, HES ONL MAIN OP SUMM