Common Fragile Sites: Genomic Hotspots of DNA Damage and Carcinogenesis

被引:53
|
作者
Ma, Ke [1 ,2 ]
Qiu, Li [1 ,2 ]
Mrasek, Kristin [3 ]
Zhang, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Liehr, Thomas [3 ]
Quintana, Luciana Goncalves [3 ]
Li, Zheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ, Canc Inst & Hosp, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Med Univ, Canc Inst & Hosp, Minist Educ Breast Canc Prevent & Treatment, Key Lab, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Jena, Jena Univ Hosp, Inst Human Genet, D-07743 Jena, Germany
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
replication; instability; CFS; cancer; FATS; checkpoint; CANCER-CELL-LINES; RADIATION-INDUCED TUMORIGENESIS; HISTONE-DEACETYLASE INHIBITORS; EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CANCER; TUMOR-SUPPRESSOR GENES; HUMAN-CHROMOSOME; 7; LUNG-CANCER; CERVICAL-CARCINOMA; VIRAL INTEGRATION; MOLECULAR-BASIS;
D O I
10.3390/ijms130911974
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Genomic instability, a hallmark of cancer, occurs preferentially at specific genomic regions known as common fragile sites (CFSs). CFSs are evolutionarily conserved and late replicating regions with AT-rich sequences, and CFS instability is correlated with cancer. In the last decade, much progress has been made toward understanding the mechanisms of chromosomal instability at CFSs. However, despite tremendous efforts, identifying a cancer-associated CFS gene (CACG) remains a challenge and little is known about the function of CACGs at most CFS loci. Recent studies of FATS (for Fragile-site Associated Tumor Suppressor), a new CACG at FRA10F, reveal an active role of this CACG in regulating DNA damage checkpoints and suppressing tumorigenesis. The identification of FATS may inspire more discoveries of other uncharacterized CACGs. Further elucidation of the biological functions and clinical significance of CACGs may be exploited for cancer biomarkers and therapeutic benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:11974 / 11999
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DNA and protein damage in NO carcinogenesis
    Tannenbaum, S
    NITRIC OXIDE-BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2004, 11 (01): : 38 - 38
  • [32] POPULATION CYTOGENETICS OF FOLATE-SENSITIVE FRAGILE SITES .1. COMMON FRAGILE SITES
    KAHKONEN, M
    HUMAN GENETICS, 1988, 80 (04) : 344 - 348
  • [33] Common fragile sites current knowledge and hypotheses
    Schroeck, Evelin
    Langhof, Viola
    Rump, Andreas
    CELLULAR ONCOLOGY, 2008, 30 (02) : 101 - 101
  • [34] Common fragile sites are characterized by histone hypoacetylation
    Jiang, Yanwen
    Lucas, Isabelle
    Young, David J.
    Davis, Elizabeth M.
    Karrison, Theodore
    Rest, Joshua S.
    Le Beau, Michelle M.
    HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2009, 18 (23) : 4501 - 4512
  • [35] RARE, POLYMORPHIC, AND COMMON FRAGILE SITES - A CLASSIFICATION
    HECHT, F
    HUMAN GENETICS, 1986, 74 (02) : 207 - 208
  • [36] DAPI-INDUCIBLE COMMON FRAGILE SITES
    PELLICCIA, F
    ROCCHI, A
    CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1986, 42 (03): : 174 - 176
  • [37] Common fragile sites as targets for chromosome rearrangements
    Arlt, Martin F.
    Durkin, Sandra G.
    Ragland, Ryan L.
    Glover, Thomas W.
    DNA REPAIR, 2006, 5 (9-10) : 1126 - 1135
  • [38] Revisiting the mechanism of common fragile sites instability
    Le Tallec, B.
    Dutrillaux, B.
    Blinm, M.
    Brison, O.
    Debatisse, M.
    CELLULAR ONCOLOGY, 2012, 35 : S6 - S7
  • [39] The molecular basis of common and rare fragile sites
    Schwartz, M
    Zlotorynski, E
    Kerem, B
    CANCER LETTERS, 2006, 232 (01) : 13 - 26
  • [40] ARABINOFURANOSYL NUCLEOSIDES INDUCE COMMON FRAGILE SITES
    LEONARD, JC
    LEONARD, RC
    THOMPSON, KH
    HUMAN GENETICS, 1988, 79 (02) : 157 - 162