Characterization of drug-protein binding process by employing equilibrium sampling through hollow-fiber supported liquid membrane and Bjerrum and Scatchard plots

被引:36
作者
Barri, Thaer [1 ]
Trtic-Petrovic, Tatjana [2 ]
Karlsson, Michael [1 ]
Jonsson, Jan Ake [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Analyt Chem, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Vinca Inst Nucl Sci, Phys Lab, Belgrade 11001, Serbia
关键词
drug-protein binding; free concentration; equilibrium sampling through membrane; binding parameters; Bjerrum and Scatchard plots;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpba.2008.04.030
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The technique equilibrium sampling through membrane (ESTM) was extended to measuring the free drug concentration in solutions of drug and protein. Bjerrum and Scatchard plots were employed for characterizing individual drug binding to pure human blood proteins. Four drugs were investigated as a model system: fluvoxamine and ropivacaine which dominantly bind to alpha-acid glycoprotein (AGP), and R,S-ibuprofen and S-ketoprofen which highly bind to human serum albumin (HSA). The level of drug binding to AGP and HSA relied on drug and protein concentrations. Bjerrum and Scatchard plots revealed high affinity constants (K-a) at low protein concentration. Both Bjerrum and Scatchard plots of fluvoxamine and ne binding to AGP showed one specific binding site (n(1) = 1) with ropivacaine K-a value close to 5 ropivacaine K-a value close to 5 times higher than the K-a of fluvoxamine at 22.9 mu M AGP concentration. Bjerrum plots of ketoprofen and ibuprofen gave total number of binding sites or bound molecules of 6-7, which did not depend on the drug or protein concentration. Scatchard plots of ketoprofen and ibuprofen exhibited two binding sites (n(1) and n(2)) at 0.15 mu M and 0.75 mu M HSA concentrations. On one hand, at 0.15 mu M HSA, ketoprofen and ibuprofen were bound to site I at n(1) = 1.2 and n(1) = 1.0, respectively. However, at 0.75 mu M HSA, ketoprofen and ibuprofen were bound to site I at n(1) = 1.2 and n(1) = 1.9, respectively. On the other hand, site 11, at 0.15 mu M HSA, interacted with ketoprofen and ibuprofen at n(2) = 5.6 and 6.7, respectively. However, at 0.75 mu M HSA, site II interacted with ketoprofen at n(2) = 7.4 and ibuprofen at n(2) = 6.2. It would be concluded that, upon mixing ketoprofen and ibuprofen in a HSA solution, a ketoprofen-ibuprofen interaction would most likely occur at site II in HSA. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 56
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Serum protein binding of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: A comparative study [J].
Borga, O ;
Borga, B .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1997, 25 (01) :63-77
[2]  
BRODERSEN R, 1998, TRENDS PHARMACOL SCI, V9, P252
[3]   Comparison of five methods for the study of drug-protein binding in affinity capillary electrophoresis [J].
Busch, MHA ;
Carels, LB ;
Boelens, HFM ;
Kraak, JC ;
Poppe, H .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1997, 777 (02) :311-328
[4]  
CARTER DC, 1994, ADV PROTEIN CHEM, V45, P153
[5]  
Cohen LH, 2004, METHOD PHARMACOL TOX, P111
[6]   Relationship between lipophilicity and binding to human serum albumin of arylpropionic acid non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [J].
DeschampsLabat, L ;
Pehourcq, F ;
Jagou, M ;
Bannwarth, B .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 1997, 16 (02) :223-229
[7]  
FEHSKE KJ, 1982, MOL PHARMACOL, V21, P387
[8]   High-performance affinity chromatography: a powerful tool for studying serum protein binding [J].
Hage, DS .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2002, 768 (01) :3-30
[9]   Negligible depletion solid-phase microextraction with radiolabeled analytes to study free concentrations and protein binding:: An example with [3H]Estradiol [J].
Heringa, MB ;
Pastor, D ;
Algra, J ;
Vaes, WHJ ;
Hermens, JLM .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 74 (23) :5993-5997
[10]   DRUG-BINDING IN PLASMA - A SUMMARY OF RECENT TRENDS IN THE STUDY OF DRUG AND HORMONE-BINDING [J].
HERVE, F ;
URIEN, S ;
ALBENGRES, E ;
DUCHE, JC ;
TILLEMENT, JP .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1994, 26 (01) :44-58