ASSESSING INTERPERSONAL UNDERSTANDING WITH MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS

被引:0
作者
Norris, David
Jackel, Brad
机构
来源
EDULEARN11: 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES | 2011年
关键词
Medical entrance tests; interpersonal testing; multiple choice questions; emotional Intelligence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Multiple choice questions (MCQs) which assess an ability to understand interpersonal situations and to reason about human motivations have become an increasingly important consideration in the medical selection process. Interpersonal MCQs are currently being used in Australia as part of a battery of instruments to discriminate between large numbers of academically qualified candidates applying for limited places in university medical courses. These MCQs form a component of the Australian Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test (UMAT), constructed by the Australian Council for Educational Research for the UMAT consortium of universities. This paper will outline the function and purpose of interpersonal MCQs, including their relationship to other tests such as self-report personality tests and other English comprehension or critical thinking tests. Using examples, the paper will describe the process of constructing interpersonal MCQs, outlining the main issues and difficulties encountered when selecting material and creating questions. Such issues include the extent of verbal loading, the subjective opinions of the reader, the intentions of the author, the plausibility of incorrect answers (distracters) and the defensible correctness of answers (keys). Item panelling, in-test trialling, and the psychometric properties of successful questions will also be discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:2106 / 2114
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, EMOTIONAL DEV EMOTIO
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, UMAT PRACT QUEST, V1
  • [3] Bar-On R., 1997, The Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): Technical manual
  • [4] The art of medicine Science as superstition: selecting medical students
    Barr, Donald A.
    [J]. LANCET, 2010, 376 (9742) : 678 - 679
  • [5] Bryce J., 2004, INT TEST US C ACER
  • [6] Bryce J., 2008, 29 INT C PSYCH 20 25
  • [7] Gardner H., 1992, Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice
  • [8] Gardner Howard., 1993, FRAMES MIND, V2d
  • [9] Goleman D, 1996, EMOTIONAL INTELLIGEN
  • [10] Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds
    Mar, Raymond A.
    Oatley, Keith
    Hirsh, Jacob
    dela Paz, Jennifer
    Peterson, Jordan B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2006, 40 (05) : 694 - 712