Causal relationships in creative problem solving: Comparing facilitation interventions for ideation

被引:132
作者
Santanen, EL [1 ]
Briggs, RO
De Vreede, GJ
机构
[1] Bucknell Univ, Lewisburg, PA 17837 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Ctr Management Informat, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Delft Univ Technol, NL-2600 AA Delft, Netherlands
[4] Univ Nebraska, Dept Informat Syst & Quantitat Anal, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
关键词
brainstorming; cognitive models; creativity; facilitation; group problem solving; group support systems; idea generation; ideation; thinkLets;
D O I
10.1080/07421222.2004.11045783
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Organizations must be creative continuously to Survive and thrive in today's highly competitive, rapidly changing environment. A century of creativity research has produced several descriptive models creativity, and hundreds of prescriptions for interventions that demonstrably improve creativity. This paper presents the cognitive network model (CNM) as a causal model of the cognitive mechanisms that give rise to creative solutions in the human mind. The model may explain why creativity prescriptions work as they do. The model may also provide a basis for deriving new techniques to further enhance creativity. The paper tests the model in an experiment where 61 four-person groups used either free-brainstorming or one of three variations on directed-brainstorming to generate solutions for one of two unstructured tasks. In both tasks, people using directed-brainstorming produced more solutions with high creativity ratings, produced solutions with higher average creativity ratings, and produced higher concentrations of creative solutions than did people using free-brainstorming. Significant differences in creativity were also found among the three variations on directed-brainstorming. The findings were consistent with the CNM.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 197
页数:31
相关论文
共 71 条
[41]  
MEDIN DL, 1984, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V35, P113, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.000553
[42]   THE ASSOCIATIVE BASIS OF THE CREATIVE PROCESS [J].
MEDNICK, SA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1962, 69 (03) :220-232
[43]  
MEDNICK SA, 1964, WILDENING HORIZONS C, P1
[44]  
MILLER GA, 1956, PSYCHOL REV, V63, P81, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.343
[45]  
Minsky M., 1975, The psychology of computer vision, P211
[46]  
Mobley MI, 1992, CREATIVITY RES J, V5, P125, DOI DOI 10.1080/10400419209534428
[47]   WHEN A GROUP IS NOT A GROUP - THE COGNITIVE FOUNDATION OF GROUP IDEA GENERATION [J].
NAGASUNDARAM, M ;
DENNIS, AR .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 1993, 24 (04) :463-489
[48]  
Neisser U., 1966, Cognitive psychology
[49]  
Newell A., 1962, CONT APPROACHES CREA
[50]   DATA-LIMITED AND RESOURCE-LIMITED PROCESSES [J].
NORMAN, DA ;
BOBROW, DG .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 7 (01) :44-64