Assessing social values of ecosystem services in the Phewa Lake Watershed, Nepal

被引:55
作者
Paudyal, Kiran [1 ]
Baral, Himlal [2 ]
Keenan, Rodney John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Sci, Sch Ecosyst & Forest Sci, Carlton, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Ctr Int Forestry Res, Jalan CIFOR, Bogor 16115, Barat, Indonesia
关键词
Nepal; Community forestry; Watershed conservation; Participatory approach; Social-cultural values; Ecotourism; Sedimentation; TRADE-OFFS; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; SOCIOCULTURAL VALUATION; STAKEHOLDER PERCEPTIONS; COMMUNITY FORESTS; MANAGEMENT; SYNERGIES; PREFERENCES; ASSESSMENTS; LAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2018.01.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Community-based forestry (CBF) has developed through co-evolution of human societies, social values and biophysical systems shaped by long-term community activities. CBF has been practised for nearly 40 years in Nepal and has resulted in the restoration of forest cover to a considerable proportion of the mountain regions. In the Phewa watershed, restored forests are important for the subsistence of local communities and the provision of economically valuable recreation, aesthetic and cultural services for a wider group of stakeholders. In that context, this study aims to assess the social values of ecosystem services (ES) and their relative importance to different stakeholders. Community perceptions and expert opinions to assess and prioritise ES in the watershed were sought through focus group discussions and key informant surveys. There were 23 ecosystem services relevant to the local communities and other stakeholders in the watershed. Sediment retention, recreation and ecotourism, freshwater, firewood and timber were priority ES for local benefits, while recreation and ecotourism, biodiversity maintenance, sediment retention and carbon stock were priority ES for wider (regional global) benefits. Priority ES revealed key areas of correlation and conflict between different services and between stakeholder groups. For local benefits, trade-offs were identified between provisioning services and regulating, habitat and cultural services. Synergies were predominant between regulating, cultural and habitat services. The study indicated that the social values concept is a promising tool for eliciting people's preferences in the ES assessment and analysis of trade-offs and synergies in developing countries where community involvement is the dominant approach of forest management.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 81
页数:15
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]   Identifying forest ecosystem services through socio-ecological bundles: a case study from northern Jordan [J].
Al-assaf, Amani ;
Nawash, Oraib ;
Omari, Mohammad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) :314-321
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being: Desertification synthesis, DOI DOI 10.1196/ANNALS.1439.003
[3]   Linking biophysical models and public preferences for ecosystem service assessments: a case study for the Southern Rocky Mountains [J].
Bagstad, Kenneth J. ;
Reed, James M. ;
Semmens, Darius J. ;
Sherrouse, Benson C. ;
Troy, Austin .
REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2016, 16 (07) :2005-2018
[4]   Measuring and managing ecosystem goods and services in changing landscapes: a south-east Australian perspective [J].
Baral, Himlal ;
Keenan, Rodney J. ;
Stork, Nigel E. ;
Kasel, Sabine .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 57 (07) :961-983
[5]   Spatial assessment of ecosystem goods and services in complex production landscapes: A case study from south-eastern Australia [J].
Baral, Himlal ;
Keenan, Rodney J. ;
Fox, Julian C. ;
Stork, Nigel E. ;
Kasel, Sabine .
ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2013, 13 :35-45
[6]   Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services [J].
Bennett, Elena M. ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Gordon, Line J. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) :1394-1404
[7]   What benefits do community forests provide, and to whom? A rapid assessment of ecosystem services from a Himalayan forest, Nepal [J].
Birch, Jennifer C. ;
Thapa, Ishana ;
Balmford, Andrew ;
Bradbury, Richard B. ;
Brown, Claire ;
Butchart, Stuart H. M. ;
Gurung, Hum ;
Hughes, Francine M. R. ;
Mulligan, Mark ;
Pandeya, Bhopal ;
Peh, Kelvin S-H. ;
Stattersfield, Alison J. ;
Walpole, Matt ;
Thomas, David H. L. .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 8 :118-127
[8]   What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units [J].
Boyd, James ;
Banzhaf, Spencer .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (2-3) :616-626
[9]   Trade-Offs between Ecosystem Services in a Mountain Region [J].
Briner, Simon ;
Huber, Robert ;
Bebi, Peter ;
Elkin, Che ;
Schmatz, Dirk R. ;
Gret-Regamey, Adrienne .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (03)
[10]  
Brown G, 2000, FOREST SCI, V46, P240