The effect of aircraft seat pitch on comfort

被引:13
作者
Anjani, Shabila [1 ]
Li, Wenhua [1 ,2 ]
Ruiter, Iemkje A. [1 ]
Vink, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Ind Design Engn, Landbergstr 15, NL-2628 CE Delft, Netherlands
[2] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Shaanxi Engn Lab Ind Design, 127 Youyi Rd West, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
关键词
Seat pitch; Comfort; Discomfort; Space experience; Anthropometric measurements; DISCOMFORT; PRESSURE; SPACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103132
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This study explores the relationship between seat pitch and comfort, and the influencing factors, like space experience and anthropometric measurements. Two hundred ninety-four participants experienced economy class seats in a Boeing 737 with 28-inch, 30-inch, 32-inch and 34-inch seat pitches. Anthropometric measurements of the participants were measured. Participants completed a questionnaire on comfort (10-scale), discomfort (CP50) and space experience and the results were analysed using SPSS 25. This study showed a significant relationship between seat pitch and comfort as well as discomfort. Additionally, it was found that the mean rank of discomfort of each pitch size for the middle seat was higher than the window and aisle seat, though seat pitch did affect the (dis)comfort more compared with seat location. It was also found that anthropometric sizes significantly affect the (dis)comfort on smaller pitch sizes, and all space experience questions had a correlation to the pitch sizes.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Attitudes towards personal and shared space during the flight
    Ahmadpour, N.
    Kuehne, M.
    Robert, J-M.
    Vink, P.
    [J]. WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2016, 54 (04): : 981 - 987
  • [2] Anjani Shabila, 2019, Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). Volume VI: Transport Ergonomics and Human Factors (TEHF), Aerospace Human Factors and Ergonomics. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (AISC 823), P504, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_53
  • [3] Bazley C., 2015, COMFORT BUILT ENV, DOI [10.4233/uuid:ebb82e2d-e786-4bcf-8c49-b7871932726, DOI 10.4233/UUID:EBB82E2D-E786-4BCF-8C49-B7871932726]
  • [4] Blok M., 2007, Tijdschrift voor Ergonomie, V32, P4
  • [5] Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures
    de Looze, MP
    Kuijt-Evers, LFM
    van Dieën, J
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2003, 46 (10) : 985 - 997
  • [6] Groenensteijn L, 2015, IND ENG, P197, DOI [10.4233/uuid:19060a11-6d6c-46dd-9f47-8583d1610b94, DOI 10.4233/UUID:19060A11-6D6C-46DD-9F47-8583D1610B94]
  • [7] Field studies of comfort and discomfort in sitting
    Helander, MG
    Zhang, LJ
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 1997, 40 (09) : 895 - 915
  • [8] ICAO, 2017, AIR TRANSP PASS CARR, P1970
  • [9] Aircraft seating comfort: the influence of seat pitch on passengers' well-being
    Kremser, Florian
    Guenzkofer, Fabian
    Sedlmeier, Claudia
    Sabbah, Olaf
    Bengler, Klaus
    [J]. WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2012, 41 : 4936 - 4942
  • [10] Evaluating the low back biomechanics of three different office workstations: Seated, standing, and perching
    Le, Peter
    Marras, William S.
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2016, 56 : 170 - 178