The Significance of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Diffuse Glioma

被引:5
作者
Jovanovic, Nikola [1 ]
Lazarevic, Milica [1 ]
Cvetkovic, Vladimir J. [1 ]
Nikolov, Vesna [2 ]
Peric, Jelena Kostic [3 ]
Ugrin, Milena [3 ]
Pavlovic, Sonja [3 ]
Mitrovic, Tatjana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nis, Fac Sci & Math, Dept Biol & Ecol, Lab Mol Biol & Biotechnol, Nish 18000, Serbia
[2] Univ Nis, Fac Med, Clin Neurosurg, Ctr Clin, Nish 18000, Serbia
[3] Univ Belgrade, Inst Mol Genet & Genet Engn, Lab Mol Biomed, Belgrade 11042, Serbia
关键词
diffuse glioma; glioblastoma; MGMT; IDH1; IDH2; MSP; qMSP; CENTRAL-NERVOUS-SYSTEM; NEWLY-DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA; INTEGRATED GENOMIC ANALYSIS; IDH1; MUTATIONS; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; TEMOZOLOMIDE CHEMOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT TEMOZOLOMIDE; PREDICTS SURVIVAL; METHYLTRANSFERASE; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.3390/ijms232113034
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A single-institution observational study with 43 newly diagnosed diffuse gliomas defined the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) gene mutation status and evaluated the prognostic relevance of the methylation status of the epigenetic marker O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Younger patients (<50 years) with surgically resected glioma and temozolomide (TMZ) adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with better prognosis, consistent with other studies. The methylation status depends on the chosen method and the cut-off value determination. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) established the methylation status for 36 glioma patients (19 (52.8%) positively methylated and 17 (47.2%) unmethylated) without relevancy for the overall survival (OS) (p = 0.33). On the other side, real-time methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) revealed 23 tumor samples (54%) that were positively methylated without association with OS (p = 0.15). A combined MSP analysis, which included the homogenous cohort of 24 patients (>50 years with surgical resection and IDH1/2-wildtype diffuse glioma), distinguished 10 (41.6%) methylated samples from 14 (58.4%) unmethylated samples. Finally, significant correlation between OS and methylation status was noticed (p approximate to 0.05). The OS of the hypermethylated group was 9.6 +/- 1.77 months, whereas the OS of the unmethylated group was 5.43 +/- 1.04 months. Our study recognized the MGMT promoter methylation status as a positive prognostic factor within the described homogenous cohort, although further verification in a larger population of diffuse gliomas is required.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predictive impact of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma of the elderly
    Reifenberger, Guido
    Hentschel, Bettina
    Felsberg, Joerg
    Schackert, Gabriele
    Simon, Matthias
    Schnell, Oliver
    Westphal, Manfred
    Wick, Wolfgang
    Pietsch, Torsten
    Loeffler, Markus
    Weller, Michael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 131 (06) : 1342 - 1350
  • [42] MGMT promoter methylation determined by HRM in comparison to MSP and pyrosequencing for predicting high-grade glioma response
    Switzeny, Olivier J.
    Christmann, Markus
    Renovanz, Mirjam
    Giese, Alf
    Sommer, Clemens
    Kaina, Bernd
    [J]. CLINICAL EPIGENETICS, 2016, 8
  • [43] Absence of MGMT promoter methylation in diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant
    Rouzbeh Banan
    Arne Christians
    Stephan Bartels
    Ulrich Lehmann
    Christian Hartmann
    [J]. Acta Neuropathologica Communications, 5
  • [44] Deciphering glioblastoma: Unveiling imaging markers for predicting MGMT promoter methylation status
    Hexem, Eric
    Taha, Taha Abd-ElSalam Ashraf
    Dhemesh, Yaseen
    Baqar, Mohammad Aneel
    Nada, Ayman
    [J]. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CANCER, 2025, 54
  • [45] Correlation of MGMT promoter methylation status with gene and protein expression levels in glioblastoma
    Uno, Miyuki
    Oba-Shinjo, Sueli Mieko
    Camargo, Anamaria Aranha
    Moura, Ricardo Pereira
    de Aguiar, Paulo Henrique
    Cabrera, Hector Navarro
    Begnami, Marcos
    Rosemberg, Sergio
    Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen
    Nagahashi Marie, Suely Kazue
    [J]. CLINICS, 2011, 66 (10) : 1747 - 1755
  • [46] Confounding Factors in Diagnostics of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Glioblastomas in Stereotactic Biopsies
    Weise, Lutz M.
    Harter, Patrick N.
    Eibach, Sebastian
    Braczynski, Anne K.
    Dunst, Maika
    Rieger, Johannes
    Baehr, Oliver
    Hattingen, Elke
    Steinbach, Joachim P.
    Plate, Karl H.
    Seifert, Volker
    Mittelbronn, Michel
    [J]. STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 92 (03) : 129 - 139
  • [47] Effect of segmentation dimension on radiomics analysis for MGMT promoter methylation status in gliomas
    Fukui, Ryohei
    Onishi, Masataka
    Hasegawa, Koshi
    Ohata, Miyu
    Kida, Katsuhiro
    Goto, Sachiko
    [J]. AKTUALNOSCI NEUROLOGICZNE, 2024, 24 (01): : 8 - 14
  • [48] Quantitative analysis of MGMT promoter methylation status changes by pyrosequencing in recurrent glioblastoma
    Gonzalez Jimenez, Victor
    Brell Doval, Marta
    Gomez Bellvert, Cristina
    Goliney Goliney, Victor
    Salazar Asencio, Osman
    Gomez Martin, Adriana
    Ibanez Dominguez, Javier
    [J]. NEUROPATHOLOGY, 2023, 43 (04) : 306 - 312
  • [49] The Changes in MGMT Promoter Methylation Status in Initial and Recurrent Glioblastomas
    Park, Chul-Kee
    Kim, Ja Eun
    Kim, Ji Young
    Song, Sang Woo
    Kim, Jin Wook
    Choi, Seung Hong
    Kim, Tae Min
    Lee, Se-Hoon
    Kim, Il Han
    Park, Sung-Hye
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 5 (05): : 393 - U114
  • [50] Association of MGMT Gene Promoter Methylation With Clinicopathological Parameters in Patients With Wild-type IDH Glioblastoma
    Kim, Moonsik
    Yoo, Jihwan
    Chang, Jong Hee
    Kim, Se Hoon
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 42 (01) : 335 - 341