National survey of end-of-life decisions made by UK medical practitioners

被引:92
作者
Seale, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Brunel Univ, Sch Social Sci & Law, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
关键词
euthanasia; physician-assisted suicide; right to die; terminal care; withdrawing treatment; withholding treatment;
D O I
10.1191/0269216306pm1094oa
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study estimates the frequency of different end-of-life decisions (ELDs) in medical practice in the UK, compares these with other countries and assesses doctors' views on the adequacy of current UK law. Method: Postal survey of 857 UK medical practitioners using a questionnaire used in other countries. Findings: The proportion of UK deaths involving an ELD were: 1) voluntary euthanasia 0.16% (0-0.36), 2) physician-assisted suicide 0.00%, 3) ending of life without an explicit request from patient 0.33% (0-0.76), 4) alleviation of symptoms with possibly life shortening effect 32.8% (28.1-37.6), 5) non-treatment decisions 30.3% (26.0-34.6). ELDs 1 and 2 were significantly less frequent than in the Netherlands and Australia; ELD 2 was also less frequent than Switzerland. ELD 3 was less frequent than in Belgium and Australia. Comparison of UK and New Zealand general practitioners showed lower rates of ELDs 4 and 5 in the UK. ELD 5 was more common than in most other European countries. A few doctors attending deaths felt UK law had inhibited or interfered with their preferred management of patients (4.6% (3.1-6.1%) of doctors) or that a new law would have facilitated better management (2.6% (1.4-3.8%) of doctors). Interpretation: The lower relative rate of ELDs involving doctor-assisted dying in the UK, and the relatively high rate of non-treatment decisions, suggests a culture of medical, decision making informed by a palliative care philosophy.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 10
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals [J].
Asch, DA ;
Jedrziewski, MK ;
Christakis, NA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (10) :1129-1136
[2]   Forgoing treatment at the end of life in 6 European countries [J].
Bosshard, G ;
Nilstun, T ;
Bilsen, J ;
Norup, M ;
Miccinesi, G ;
van Delden, JJM ;
Faisst, K ;
van der Heide, A .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (04) :401-407
[3]  
Council of American Survey Research Organizations, CASRO COD STAND ETH
[4]   End-of-life decisions in medical practice in Flanders, Belgium: a nationwide survey [J].
Deliens, L ;
Mortier, F ;
Bilsen, J ;
Cosyns, M ;
Vander Stichele, R ;
Vanoverloop, J ;
Ingels, K .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9244) :1806-1811
[5]   Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review [J].
Edwards, P ;
Roberts, I ;
Clarke, M ;
DiGuiseppi, C ;
Pratap, S ;
Wentz, R ;
Kwan, I .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7347) :1183-1185
[6]  
Kmietowicz Zosia, 2004, BMJ, V329, P939, DOI 10.1136/bmj.329.7472.939-b
[7]   End-of-life decisions in Australian medical practice [J].
Kuhse, H ;
Singer, P ;
Baume, P ;
Clark, M ;
Rickard, M .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1997, 166 (04) :191-196
[8]  
MENDENHALL W, 1971, ELEMENTARY SURVEY SA, P181
[9]   National survey of medical decisions at end of life made by New Zealand general practitioners [J].
Mitchell, K ;
Owens, RG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7408) :202-203
[10]   Euthanasia and other end-of-life decisions in the Netherlands in 1990, 1995, and 2001 [J].
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, BD ;
van der Heide, A ;
Koper, D ;
Keij-Deerenberg, I ;
Rietjens, JAC ;
Rurup, ML ;
Vrakking, AM ;
Georges, JJ ;
Muller, MT ;
van der Wal, G ;
van der Maas, PJ .
LANCET, 2003, 362 (9381) :395-399