Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty -: Is it as accurate as CT-based navigation?

被引:238
作者
Kalteis, T [1 ]
Handel, A [1 ]
Bäthis, H [1 ]
Perlick, L [1 ]
Tingart, M [1 ]
Grifka, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Asklepios Klinikum Bad Abbach, D-93077 Bad Abbach, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME | 2006年 / 88B卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.88B2.17163
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In a prospective randomised clinical study acetabular components were implanted either freehand (n = 30) or using CT-based (n = 30) or imageless navigation (n = 30). The position of the component was determined post-operatively on CT scans of the pelvis. Following conventional freehand placement of the acetabular component, only 14 of the 30 were within the safe zone as defined by Lewinnek et al (40 degrees inclination SD 10 degrees; 15 degrees anteversion SD 10 degrees). After computer-assisted navigation 25 of 30 acetabular components (CT-based) and 28 of 30 components (imageless) were positioned within this limit (overall p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between CT-based and imageless navigation (p = 0.23); both showed a significant reduction in variation of the position of the acetabular component compared with conventional freehand arthroplasty (p < 0.001). The duration of the operation was increased by eight minutes with imageless and by 17 minutes with CT-based navigation. Imageless navigation proved as reliable as that using CT in positioning the acetabular component.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 167
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios [J].
D'Lima, DD ;
Urquhart, AG ;
Buehler, KO ;
Walker, RH ;
Colwell, CW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (03) :315-321
[2]   Effects of acetabular abduction on cup wear rates in total hip arthroplasty [J].
Del Schutte, H ;
Lipman, AJ ;
Bannar, SM ;
Livermore, JT ;
Ilstrup, D ;
Morrey, BF .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (06) :621-626
[3]  
DeWal Hargovind, 2003, Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), V32, P377
[4]   Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket [J].
DiGioia, AM ;
Jaramaz, B ;
Plakseychuk, AY ;
Moody, JE ;
Nikou, C ;
LaBarca, RS ;
Levison, TJ ;
Picard, F .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (03) :359-364
[5]   Computer-assisted navigated cup placement in primary and secondary dysplastic hips [J].
Haaker, R ;
Tiedjen, K ;
Rubenthaler, F ;
Stockheim, M .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 2003, 141 (01) :105-111
[6]   Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement [J].
Hassan, DM ;
Johnston, GHF ;
Dust, WNC ;
Watson, G ;
Dolovich, AT .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (01) :80-84
[7]  
HERRLIN K, 1988, ACTA RADIOL, V29, P357
[8]   Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement [J].
Jaramaz, B ;
DiGioia, AM ;
Blackwell, M ;
Nikou, C .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1998, (354) :70-81
[9]  
Jaramaz B, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V355, P8
[10]   Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty - A multivariate analysis [J].
Jolles, BM ;
Zangger, P ;
Leyvraz, PF .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (03) :282-288