Life expectancy and trade openness: causality in Latin America

被引:0
|
作者
Akyuz, Mert [1 ]
Karul, Cagin [2 ]
Demir, Ibrahim [1 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Dept Econ, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Pamukkale Univ, Dept Econometr, Denizli, Turkey
关键词
International trade; Population health; South America; Bootstrap panel Granger causality; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; UNIT-ROOT; LONG-RUN;
D O I
10.1108/IJSE-01-2020-0013
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of this research is to investigate the causal relationship between trade openness (TO) and life expectancy (LE) at birth in Latin American countries over the period of 1980-2014. Design/methodology/approach The bootstrap panel Granger causality test proposed by Emirmahmutoglu and Kose (2011) was used to determine the direction of causality in the presence of cross-sectional dependency and heterogeneity among Latin American countries. Also, four different tests were employed in order to determine the cross-sectional dependency and slope homogeneity. The stationarity properties of variables were inspected by employing a unit root test. Findings The findings indicated that Granger causality existed between TO and LE, at birth which was running from the former to the latter for panel. On a country basis, TO Granger caused LE at birth for countries with low level of economic development and higher taxes on income and profits. Practical implications This study provides new insights for policymaking regarding the role of TO in achieving comprehensive economic reforms to increase LE at birth during a period of intense trade rivalry across nations. Originality/value Although research in the literature has mainly focused on the impact of TO on LE at birth with panel data, most studies ignored the regional effects. It is the authors' concern that the direction of causality can be country-specific and have regional characteristics. In this regard, instead of dividing countries for a specific region into two parts such as developing and developed, the authors investigated the pattern of trade-health link for a specific region, Latin America.
引用
收藏
页码:1265 / 1281
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comment on "On the openness to trade as a determinant of the macroeconomic elasticity of substitution"
    Irmen, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF MACROECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (02) : 703 - 706
  • [42] Does Trade Openness Affect Global Entrepreneurship Development? Evidence from BRICS Countries
    Rahman, Md. Mominur
    Deb, Bishawjit Chandra
    Rahman, Muhammad Shajib
    Uddin, M. M. Mofiz
    Ramzan, Muhammad
    Hossain, Mohammad Jubair
    Uddin, Gias
    ANNALS OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 18 (03)
  • [43] Endogenous Financial and Trade Openness
    Aizenman, Joshua
    Noy, Ilan
    REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2009, 13 (02) : 175 - 189
  • [44] A New Measure of Trade Openness
    Squalli, Jay
    Wilson, Kenneth
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2011, 34 (10) : 1745 - 1770
  • [45] Effects of trade liberalization on economic growth and balance of payments in Latin America
    Pacheco Lopez, Peneope
    INVESTIGACION ECONOMICA, 2009, 68 (267): : 13 - +
  • [46] Latin America meets China and India: prospects and challenges for trade and investment
    Rosales, Osvaldo
    Kuwayama, Mikio
    CEPAL REVIEW, 2007, (93): : 81 - 103
  • [47] Life is Unfair in Latin America, But Does it Matter for Growth?
    Blanco, Luisa
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 38 (03) : 393 - 404
  • [48] Accessing the causality among air transportation, trade openness and GDP: Evidence from a panel of high-income countries
    Rai, Sushil Kumar
    Raju, T. Bangar
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2025, 163 : 116 - 124
  • [49] Trade Openness and Financial Development in the New EU Member States: Evidence from a Granger Panel Bootstrap Causality Test
    Wajda-Lichy, Marta
    Kawa, Pawel
    Fijorek, Kamil
    Denkowska, Sabina
    EASTERN EUROPEAN ECONOMICS, 2020, 58 (03) : 242 - 263
  • [50] The open veins of Latin America: Long-term physical trade flows (1900-2016)
    Infante-Amate, Juan
    Urrego-Mesa, Alexander
    Pinero, Pablo
    Tello, Enric
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2022, 76