Development of public health priorities for end-of-life initiatives

被引:34
作者
Rao, JK
Alongi, J
Anderson, LA
Jenkins, L
Stokes, GA
Kane, M
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Adult & Community Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Canc Prevent & Control, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Assoc State & Territorial Chron Dis Program Direc, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Concept Syst Inc, Ithaca, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2005.08.014
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Recently, end-of-life (EOL) issues have captured the attention of the public health community. This study reports a project to help state health departments better understand their potential role in addressing EOL issues and develop initial priorities for EOL activities. Methods: The project involved two studies. Study 1 (October 2002 to September 2003) involved a concept mapping process to solicit and organize recommendations from key stakeholders. Concept mapping integrates qualitative group processes with multivariate statistical analysis to represent the ideas of stakeholders visually through reaps. A key-informant approach was used to identify stakeholder participants with expertise in aging, cancer, public health, and EOL. In two meetings, stakeholders used the maps to develop short-, intermediate-, and long-term recommendations for EOL initiatives. Study 2 (October 2003 to September 2004) involved a modified Delphi process with three iterations to prioritize recommendations for initial action from among a group of short-term recommendations. Results: Study 1 resulted in 103 recommendations for EOL initiatives across nine domains. Study 2 resulted in consensus on five initial recommendations from three domains: identifying an EOL point of contact in state health departments, collecting and analyzing data about EOL, incorporating EOL principles into state comprehensive cancer control plans, educating the public about hospice and palliative care, and educating the public about the importance of advance directives. Conclusions: Diverse perspectives of key public health stakeholders resulted in a series of short- and longer-term recommendations for EOL action. These recommendations can guide future efforts by state health departments and other public health agencies to address EOL issues.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 460
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
American Board of Internal Medicine, 1996, CAR DYING ID PROM PH
[2]  
Annas GJ, 2005, NEW ENGL J MED, V352, P1710, DOI 10.1056/NEJMlim050643
[3]  
*ASS STAT TERR CHR, 2004, ROL STAT HLTH DEP AD
[4]   Complementary and conventional medicine: A concept map [J].
Baldwin C.M. ;
Kroesen K. ;
Trochim W.M. ;
Bell I.R. .
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 4 (1)
[5]   A Delphi study to identify performance indicators for emergency medicine [J].
Beattie, E ;
Mackway-Jones, K .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2004, 21 (01) :47-50
[6]   Management of pain in elderly patients with cancer [J].
Bernabei, R ;
Gambassi, G ;
Lapane, K ;
Landi, F ;
Gatsonis, C ;
Dunlop, R ;
Lipsitz, L ;
Steel, K ;
Mor, V .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (23) :1877-1882
[7]  
BRONNER E, 2003, IMPROVE HLTH HLTH CA, V6
[8]  
Byock IR, 2001, AM J MANAG CARE, V7, P1123
[9]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999, MMWR MORB MORTAL WKL, V48, P5
[10]  
CLAYTON MJ, 1997, EDUC PSYCHOL, V17, P374