Psychology of Selfhood in China: Where is the Collective?

被引：7

作者：

Choi, Bongyoung ^{[1
]}

Han, Gyuseog ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Korea Aerosp Univ, Goyang 412791, Gyunggi Prov, South Korea

[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Kwangju 500757, South Korea

来源：

CULTURE & PSYCHOLOGY | 2009年 / 15卷 / 01期

关键词：

China; collectivism; Confucianism; Korea; relationalism; selfhood;

D O I：

10.1177/1354067X08099616

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

The analysis of Chinese maxims shows strong Confucian norms of filial piety operating in the family (Wang & Dai, 2009). Admitting that the norm is also strong in Korea, we explore the difference in selfhood between Korea and China. Taking a sociolinguistic approach, we characterize Chinese collectivism as relational collectivism and pose the question of how the collective works in Chinese selfhood. For comparative purposes, we describe the working of the collective in Korean selfhood and invite efforts to examine linguistic practice.

引用

页码：73 / 82

页数：10

共 12 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2000, LANGUAGE GENDER LANG

[2]

[Anonymous], 1995, Individualism collectivism, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780429499845

[3] The individual experience of guilt and shame in Chinese culture [J].

Bedford, OA .

CULTURE & PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 10 (01) :29-52

[4]

Cha O, 2006, THESIS U MICHIGAN

[5]

Choi SC, 2007, CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF SOCIOCULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, P318, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511611162.018

[6]

Choi Sang-Chin., 1993, INDIGENOUS PSYCHOL, P193

[7]

GABRENYA W, 1995, HDB CHINESE PSYCHOL, P309

[8] The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning [J].

Hermans, HJM .

CULTURE & PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 7 (03) :243-281

[9]

Ho D.Y. F., 1998, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, V1, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1111/1467-839X.00002, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00002]

[10]

Hwang Kwang-Kuo, 1988, Confucianism and East Asian Modernization

← 1 2 →