Evaluation of the promising neighbourhoods community program to reduce health inequalities in youth: a protocol of a mixed-methods study

被引:8
|
作者
Boelens, Mirte [1 ]
Windhorst, Dafna A. [1 ]
Jonkman, Harrie [2 ]
Hosman, Clemens M. H. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Raat, Hein [1 ]
Jansen, Wilma [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Verwey Jonker Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Hlth Promot, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Clin Psychol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Hosman Prevent & Innovat Consultancy, Berg En Dal, Netherlands
关键词
Youth; Children; Evaluation; Health; Community-based; Collaboration; Stakeholder participation; Socioeconomic prevention; CARE PREVENTION SYSTEM; SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUALITIES; CHILDHOOD OVERWEIGHT; DOWNWARD TRENDS; IMPLEMENTATION; PREVALENCE; PROMOTION; INTERVENTIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-019-6901-3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundReducing socioeconomic health inequalities among youth is a major challenge for governments around the world and reports on successful attempts are scarce. Socioecological and integral approaches with collaborative partnerships and community engagement are recommended but knowledge about the effectiveness and effective and ineffective elements is limited. The Promising Neighbourhoods program employs such an approach aiming to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in health, safety and talent development in youth. We will evaluate the process-implementation, and effectiveness of the Promising Neighbourhoods program.Methods/designCore elements of Promising Neighbourhoods are a collaborative community programming approach with stakeholders, data-based priority setting, knowledge-, and theory-based policies and evidence-based interventions. Community stakeholders and key-leaders from the neighbourhoods are engaged in the program. For this evaluation study the program will be implemented in three intervention neighbourhoods. These neighbourhoods will be compared to three control neighbourhoods at baseline in 2018/2019 and at follow-up in 2020/2021 after full implementation of the Promising Neighbourhoods program. Intervention neighbourhoods receive a tailored intervention-package including evidence-based interventions and additional measures by community stakeholders. In control neighbourhoods, no special planning will take place thus interventions are offered as usual. A mixed-methods approach following the stages of the logic model from program is applied for this evaluation. Questionnaires, focus groups, and registration data will be collected among community stakeholders, key-leaders, and youth to evaluate the process-implementation of the program. Indicators of intermediate and ultimate outcomes will be studied among N=818 children and N=818 youngsters using difference-in-difference regression analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of the Promising Neighbourhoods program.DiscussionHypotheses are that a collaborative community approach with stakeholders leads to clear priority-setting and better tailored interventions of better quality. We further hypothesise a decline in socioeconomic inequalities in intermediate and ultimate outcomes for health, safety and talent development in the intervention neighbourhoods in comparison to control neighbourhoods. The results add knowledge about effective and ineffective elements of collaborative community programming approaches to reduce health inequalities in youth and thus are relevant for local and national public health authorities.Trial registrationNetherlands National Trial Register number NL7279. Date of registration: 26-Sept-2018.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Community-Based Management of Acute Malnutrition to Reduce Wasting in Urban Informal Settlements of Mumbai, India: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
    More, Neena Shah
    Waingankar, Anagha
    Ramani, Sudha
    Chanani, Sheila
    D'Souza, Vanessa
    Pantvaidya, Shanti
    Fernandez, Armida
    Jayaraman, Anuja
    GLOBAL HEALTH-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2018, 6 (01): : 103 - 127
  • [42] Mixed-method evaluation of a community-based postpartum support program: a study protocol
    Etowa, Josephine
    Johnston, Amy
    Jama, Zahra
    Eccles, Kristin M.
    Ashton, Alicia
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [43] Engaging youth for positive change: A mixed methods evaluation of site level program implementation & outcomes
    Bennett, Kyle M.
    Campbell, Jeanna M.
    Hays, Scott P.
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2022, 141
  • [44] Youth purpose during the great recession: A mixed-methods study
    Bronk, Kendall Cotton
    Leontopoulou, Sophie
    McConchie, James
    JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 14 (04) : 405 - 416
  • [45] Development and psychometric testing of an instrument for measuring social participation of adolescents: study protocol of a prospective mixed-methods study
    Baerwalde, Tim
    Gebhard, Britta
    Hoffmann, Laura
    Roick, Julia
    Martin, Olaf
    Neurath, Anna-Lena
    Fink, Astrid
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [46] Community intervention to reduce social isolation in older adults in disadvantaged urban areas: study protocol for a mixed methods multi-approach evaluation
    Jose Lopez, Maria
    Lapena, Carolina
    Sanchez, Alba
    Continente, Xavier
    Fernandez, Ana
    Perez, Anna
    Astorga, Camila
    Cortina, Carme
    Rey, Cristina
    Diez, Elia
    Pujol, Enriqueta
    Daban, Ferran
    Castillo, Gemma
    Robles, Iolanda
    Artazcoz, Lucia
    Pons, Mariona
    Mari-Dell'Olmo, Marc
    Petit, Montse
    Sagarra, Natalia
    Calzada, Nuria
    Juarez, Olga
    Bartoll, Xavier
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [47] A mixed-methods study on the assessment of the mental health concerns among university students in the Philippines
    Bangalan, Sherna G.
    Agnes, Maria Claudette A.
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 43 (22) : 19804 - 19819
  • [48] A school-based interdisciplinary approach to promote health and academic achievement among children in a deprived neighborhood: study protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation
    Mariëlle E. Abrahamse
    Caroline S. Jonkman
    Janneke Harting
    BMC Public Health, 18
  • [49] Implementation of a new prenatal care model to reduce office visits and increase connectivity and continuity of care: protocol for a mixed-methods study
    Ridgeway, Jennifer L.
    LeBlanc, Annie
    Branda, Megan
    Harms, Roger W.
    Morris, Megan A.
    Nesbitt, Kate
    Gostout, Bobbie S.
    Barkey, Lenae M.
    Sobolewski, Susan M.
    Brodrick, Ellen
    Inselman, Jonathan
    Baron, Anne
    Sivly, Angela
    Baker, Misty
    Finnie, Dawn
    Chaudhry, Rajeev
    Famuyide, Abimbola O.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2015, 15
  • [50] Strategies to Treat and Prevent HIV in the United States for Adolescents and Young Adults: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study
    Rotheram, Mary Jane
    Fernandez, Maria Isabel
    Lee, Sung-Jae
    Abdalian, Sue Ellen
    Kozina, Leslie
    Koussa, Maryann
    Comulada, Warren Scott
    Klausner, Jeffrey D.
    Arnold, Elizabeth Mayfield
    Ocasio, Manuel A.
    Swendeman, Dallas
    Weiss, Robert
    Brookmeyer, Ronald
    Tang, Wenze
    Nielsen-Saines, Karin
    Bryson, Yvonne
    Kerin, Tara
    Shannon, Chelsea
    Cortado, Ruth
    Mitchell, Kate
    Milburn, Norweeta
    Reback, Cathy
    Lightfoot, Marguerita
    Harris, Danielle
    Fournier, Jasmine
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2019, 8 (01):