Evaluation of the promising neighbourhoods community program to reduce health inequalities in youth: a protocol of a mixed-methods study

被引:8
|
作者
Boelens, Mirte [1 ]
Windhorst, Dafna A. [1 ]
Jonkman, Harrie [2 ]
Hosman, Clemens M. H. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Raat, Hein [1 ]
Jansen, Wilma [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Verwey Jonker Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Hlth Promot, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Clin Psychol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Hosman Prevent & Innovat Consultancy, Berg En Dal, Netherlands
关键词
Youth; Children; Evaluation; Health; Community-based; Collaboration; Stakeholder participation; Socioeconomic prevention; CARE PREVENTION SYSTEM; SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUALITIES; CHILDHOOD OVERWEIGHT; DOWNWARD TRENDS; IMPLEMENTATION; PREVALENCE; PROMOTION; INTERVENTIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-019-6901-3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundReducing socioeconomic health inequalities among youth is a major challenge for governments around the world and reports on successful attempts are scarce. Socioecological and integral approaches with collaborative partnerships and community engagement are recommended but knowledge about the effectiveness and effective and ineffective elements is limited. The Promising Neighbourhoods program employs such an approach aiming to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in health, safety and talent development in youth. We will evaluate the process-implementation, and effectiveness of the Promising Neighbourhoods program.Methods/designCore elements of Promising Neighbourhoods are a collaborative community programming approach with stakeholders, data-based priority setting, knowledge-, and theory-based policies and evidence-based interventions. Community stakeholders and key-leaders from the neighbourhoods are engaged in the program. For this evaluation study the program will be implemented in three intervention neighbourhoods. These neighbourhoods will be compared to three control neighbourhoods at baseline in 2018/2019 and at follow-up in 2020/2021 after full implementation of the Promising Neighbourhoods program. Intervention neighbourhoods receive a tailored intervention-package including evidence-based interventions and additional measures by community stakeholders. In control neighbourhoods, no special planning will take place thus interventions are offered as usual. A mixed-methods approach following the stages of the logic model from program is applied for this evaluation. Questionnaires, focus groups, and registration data will be collected among community stakeholders, key-leaders, and youth to evaluate the process-implementation of the program. Indicators of intermediate and ultimate outcomes will be studied among N=818 children and N=818 youngsters using difference-in-difference regression analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of the Promising Neighbourhoods program.DiscussionHypotheses are that a collaborative community approach with stakeholders leads to clear priority-setting and better tailored interventions of better quality. We further hypothesise a decline in socioeconomic inequalities in intermediate and ultimate outcomes for health, safety and talent development in the intervention neighbourhoods in comparison to control neighbourhoods. The results add knowledge about effective and ineffective elements of collaborative community programming approaches to reduce health inequalities in youth and thus are relevant for local and national public health authorities.Trial registrationNetherlands National Trial Register number NL7279. Date of registration: 26-Sept-2018.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mental health integration in primary health services after the earthquake in Nepal: a mixed-methods program evaluation
    Leichner, Ashley
    Akhtar, Aemal
    Bhaird, Caoimhe Nic a
    Wener, Rebecca
    Perera, Shiromi M.
    Weissbecker, Inka
    GLOBAL MENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 8
  • [32] Findings from a mixed-methods study of an interprofessional faculty development program
    Abu-Rish Blakeney, Erin
    Pfeifle, Andrea
    Jones, Mandy
    Hall, Leslie Walter
    Zierler, Brenda K.
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2016, 30 (01) : 83 - 89
  • [33] A Mixed-Methods Realist Evaluation of the Implementation and Impact of Community Forensic CAMHS to Manage Risk for Young People With Forensic and Mental Health Needs: Study Protocol
    Lane, Rebecca
    D'Souza, Sophie
    Livanou, Maria
    Jacob, Jenna
    Riches, Wendy
    Ullman, Roz
    Rashid, Anisatu
    Singleton, Rosie
    Wheeler, James
    Fuggle, Peter
    Bevington, Dickon
    Deighton, Jessica
    Law, Duncan
    Fonagy, Peter
    Hindley, Nick
    White, Oliver
    Edbrooke-Childs, Julian
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 12
  • [34] A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Parent-Directed Training Program for Latine Parents
    Vela, Javier Cavazos
    Ramos, Noe
    Fielding, Cheryl
    Leija, Valerie
    Maldonado, Deyanira Bedolla
    Perez, Susana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COUNSELLING, 2025, 47 (01) : 20 - 43
  • [35] Understanding the Uptake of Big Data in Health Care: Protocol for a Multinational Mixed-Methods Study
    Wehrens, Rik
    Sihag, Vikrant
    Sulz, Sandra
    van Elten, Hilco
    van Raaij, Erik
    de Bont, Antoinette
    Weggelaar-Jansen, Anne Marie
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2020, 9 (10):
  • [36] Evaluation of the Implementation of a Home-Based Exercise Training Program for People With COPD: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Cerini, Tamara
    Kunz, Ramona
    Dalla Lana, Kaba
    Radtke, Thomas
    Polhemus, Ashley
    Puhan, Milo A.
    Frei, Anja
    FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES, 2021, 2
  • [37] Youth Access to Cigarettes Across Seven European Countries: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Nuyts, Paulien A. W.
    Hewer, Rebecca M. F.
    Kuipers, Mirte A. G.
    Lorant, Vincent
    Grard, Adeline
    Hill, Sarah
    Amos, Amanda
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (11) : 1989 - 1996
  • [38] Mixed-methods process evaluation of the Dynamic Work study: A multicomponent intervention for office workers to reduce sitting time
    Jelsma, Judith G. M.
    van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
    Renaud, Lidewij R.
    Stijnman, Dominique P. M.
    Loyen, Anne
    Huysmans, Maaike A.
    van der Beek, Allard J.
    van Nassau, Femke
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2022, 104
  • [39] Psychosocial determinants of sexual health in newly married couples: a protocol for a mixed-methods study
    Toghiani, Zahra
    Kazemi, Ashraf
    Taebi, Mahbobeh
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [40] A mixed-methods evaluation of an urban Aboriginal diabetes lifestyle program
    Power, Tamara
    East, Leah
    Gao, Yu
    Usher, Kim
    Jackson, Debra
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 45 (02) : 143 - 149