Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Access Program Is Associated With a Marked Reduction in Central Venous Catheter Use in Noncritically Ill Emergency Department Patients

被引:102
作者
Shokoohi, Hamid [1 ]
Boniface, Keith [1 ]
McCarthy, Melissa [2 ]
Al-tiae, Tareq Khedir [1 ]
Sattarian, Mehdi [1 ]
Ding, Ru [2 ]
Liu, Yiju Teresa [1 ]
Pourmand, Ali [1 ]
Schoenfeld, Elizabeth [3 ]
Scott, James [1 ]
Shesser, Robert [1 ]
Yadav, Kabir [1 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Emergency Med, Washington, DC USA
[3] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Baystate Med Ctr, Springfield, MA 01199 USA
关键词
BLOOD-STREAM INFECTIONS; PLACEMENT; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.09.016
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: We examine the central venous catheter placement rate during the implementation of an ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access program. Methods: We conducted a time-series analysis of the monthly central venous catheter rate among adult emergency department (ED) patients in an academic urban ED between 2006 and 2011. During this period, emergency medicine residents and ED technicians were trained in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access. We calculated the monthly central venous catheter placement rate overall and compared the central venous catheter reduction rate associated with the ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access program between noncritically ill patients and patients admitted to critical care. Patients receiving central venous catheters were classified as noncritically ill if admitted to telemetry or medical/surgical floor or discharged home from the ED. Results: During the study period, the ED treated a total of 401,532 patients, of whom 1,583 (0.39%) received a central venous catheter. The central venous catheter rate decreased by 80% between 2006 (0.81%) and 2011 (0.16%). The decrease in the rate was significantly greater among noncritically ill patients (mean for telemetry patients 4.4% per month [95% confidence interval {CI} 3.6% to 5.1%], floor patients 4.8% [95% CI 4.2% to 5.3%], and discharged patients 7.6% [95% CI 6.2% to 9.1%]) than critically ill patients (0.9%; 95% CI 0.6% to 1.2%). The proportion of central venous catheters that were placed in critically ill patients increased from 34% in 2006 to 81% in 2011 because fewer central venous catheterizations were performed in noncritically ill patients. Conclusion: The ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access program was associated with reductions in central venous catheter placement, particularly in noncritically ill patients. Further research is needed to determine the extent to which such access can replace central venous catheter placement in ED patients with difficult vascular access. [Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61:198-203.] Please see page 199 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 203
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Comparison of Infection Rates Among Ultrasound-Guided Versus Traditionally Placed Peripheral Intravenous Lines [J].
Adhikari, Srikar ;
Blaivas, Michael ;
Morrison, Daniel ;
Lander, Lina .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (05) :741-747
[2]  
Akmal A H, 2007, Ann Thorac Med, V2, P61, DOI 10.4103/1817-1737.32232
[3]   Ultrasound-guidance vs. standard technique in difficult vascular access patients by ED technicians [J].
Bauman, Michael ;
Braude, Darren ;
Crandall, Cameron .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 27 (02) :135-140
[4]   Emergency nurses' utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients [J].
Brannam, L ;
Blaivas, M ;
Lyon, M ;
Flake, M .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 11 (12) :1361-1363
[5]   Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access [J].
Costantino, TG ;
Parikh, AK ;
Satz, WA ;
Fojtik, JP .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 46 (05) :456-461
[6]   Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous catheter survival in ED patients with difficult access [J].
Dargin, James M. ;
Rebholz, Casey M. ;
Lowenstein, Robert A. ;
Mitchell, Patricia M. ;
Feldman, James A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 28 (01) :1-7
[7]   Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement Versus Traditional Techniques in Difficult-Access Pediatric Patients [J].
Doniger, Stephanie J. ;
Ishimine, Paul ;
Fox, John Christian ;
Kanegaye, John T. .
PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2009, 25 (03) :154-159
[8]  
Gilboy N., 2005, EMERGENCY SEVERITY I
[9]  
Knight T, 2008, BUILD QUAL HLTH CARE, V2, P18
[10]  
Kutner M. H., 2005, APPL LINEAR STAT MOD, P487