Attitudes About Regulation Among Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Customers

被引:37
作者
Bollinger, Juli Murphy [1 ]
Green, Robert C. [2 ,3 ]
Kaufman, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Genet & Publ Policy Ctr, Berman Inst Bioeth, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Genet, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/gtmb.2012.0453
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Introduction: The first regulatory rulings by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration on direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing services are expected soon. As the process of regulating these and other genetic tests moves ahead, it is important to understand the preferences of DTC genetic testing customers about the regulation of these products. Methods: An online survey of customers of three DTC genetic testing companies was conducted 2-8 months after they had received their results. Participants were asked about the importance of regulating the companies selling DTC genetic tests. Results: Most of the 1,046 respondents responded that it would be important to have a nongovernmental (84%) or governmental agency (73%) monitor DTC companies' claims to ensure the consistency with scientific evidence. However, 66% also felt that it was important that DTC tests be available without governmental oversight. Nearly, all customers favored a policy to ensure that insurers and law enforcement officials could not access their information. Discussion: Although many DTC customers want access to genetic testing services without restrictions imposed by the government regulation, most also favor an organization operating alongside DTC companies that will ensure that the claims made by the companies are consistent with sound scientific evidence. This seeming contradiction may indicate that DTC customers want to ensure that they have unfettered access to high-quality information. Additionally, policies to help ensure privacy of data would be welcomed by customers, despite relatively high confidence in the companies.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 428
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
23andMe, 2012, 23 AND ME TAKES FIRS
[2]  
[Anonymous], DTC GENETIC TESTING
[3]  
Baker M, 2012, PERSONAL GENETICS CO
[4]   The future of direct-to-consumer clinical genetic tests [J].
Frueh, Felix W. ;
Greely, Henry T. ;
Green, Robert C. ;
Hogarth, Stuart ;
Siegel, Sue .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2011, 12 (07) :511-515
[5]   Risky Business: Risk Perception and the Use of Medical Services among Customers of DTC Personal Genetic Testing [J].
Kaufman, David J. ;
Bollinger, Juli M. ;
Dvoskin, Rachel L. ;
Scott, Joan A. .
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2012, 21 (03) :413-422
[6]   Public Opinion about the Importance of Privacy in Biobank Research [J].
Kaufman, David J. ;
Murphy-Bollinger, Juli ;
Scott, Joan ;
Hudson, Kathy L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2009, 85 (05) :643-654
[7]   Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests from four state population-based surveys, and implications for clinical and public health practice [J].
Kolor, Katherine ;
Duquette, Debra ;
Zlot, Amy ;
Foland, Joan ;
Anderson, Beth ;
Giles, Rebecca ;
Wrathall, Jennifer ;
Khoury, Muin J. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (10) :860-867
[8]  
Kutz G., 2010, Direct-to-consumer genetic tests: misleading test results are further complicated by deceptive marketing and other questionable practices
[9]   Consumer gene tests poised for regulatory green light [J].
Mullard, Asher .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2012, 18 (09) :1306-1306
[10]  
National Library of Medicine National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2012, GTR GENETIC TESTING