Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework

被引:355
作者
Cherp, Aleh [1 ,2 ]
Vinichenko, Vadim [1 ]
Jewell, Jessica [3 ,6 ,7 ]
Brutschin, Elina [4 ]
Sovacool, Benjamin [5 ]
机构
[1] Cent European Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Nador U 9, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Lund Univ, Int Inst Ind Environm Econ, Tegnerplatsen 4, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
[3] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Energy Program, Schlosspl 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
[4] Webster Vienna Private Univ, Dept Int Relat, Praterstr 23, A-1020 Vienna, Austria
[5] Univ Sussex, Sci Policy Res Unit, Jubilee Bldg, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England
[6] Univ Bergen, Ctr Climate & Energy Transformat, Fosswinckelsgt 6,PB 7802, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
[7] Univ Bergen, Dept Geog, Fosswinckelsgt 6,PB 7802, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Energy transitions; Meta-theoretical framework; Variables; Co-evolution; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; TEMPORAL DYNAMICS; PATH DEPENDENCE; WIND ENERGY; POLICY; DIFFUSION; SYSTEMS; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Economic development, technological innovation, and policy change are especially prominent factors shaping energy transitions. Therefore explaining energy transitions requires combining insights from disciplines investigating these factors. The existing literature is not consistent in identifying these disciplines nor proposing how they can be combined. We conceptualize national energy transitions as a co-evolution of three types of systems: energy flows and markets, energy technologies, and energy-related policies. The focus on the three types of systems gives rise to three perspectives on national energy transitions: techno-economic with its roots in energy systems analysis and various domains of economics; socio-technical with its roots in sociology of technology, STS, and evolutionary economics; and political with its roots in political science. We use the three perspectives as an organizing principle to propose a meta-theoretical framework for analyzing national energy transitions. Following Elinor Ostrom's approach, the proposed framework explains national energy transitions through a nested conceptual map of variables and theories. In comparison with the existing meta-theoretical literature, the three perspectives framework elevates the role of political science since policies are likely to be increasingly prominent in shaping 21st century energy transitions.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 190
页数:16
相关论文
共 157 条
[1]   Political Competition, Path Dependence, and the Strategy of Sustainable Energy Transitions [J].
Aklin, Michael ;
Urpelainen, Johannes .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 57 (03) :643-658
[2]  
Allison Graham., 1999, ESSENCE DECISION, VSecond
[3]   THE RETURN TO THE STATE [J].
ALMOND, GA .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1988, 82 (03) :853-874
[4]  
Anderer J., 1981, Energy in a finite world: Paths to a sustainable future
[5]   Applying institutional theory to the low-carbon energy transition [J].
Andrews-Speed, Philip .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 13 :216-225
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, GLOB WARM SEEN MAJ P
[7]  
[Anonymous], POWER TO THE PEOPLE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2016, TRANSF EU POW SECT A
[9]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[10]  
[Anonymous], ENV INNOV SOC T