Ranking alternatives in a preferential voting system using fuzzy concepts and data envelopment analysis

被引:20
作者
Angiz, M. Zerafat [2 ]
Tajaddini, A. [3 ]
Mustafa, A. [1 ]
Kamali, M. Jalal [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Math Sci, George Town, Malaysia
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Firouzkooh Branch, Dept Math, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Bahonar Univ Kerman, Sch Math, Kerman, Iran
[4] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Management, George Town, Malaysia
关键词
Preferential voting; Data envelopment analysis; Fuzzy concepts; Group decision making; IMPRECISE DATA; DEA; MODEL; AGGREGATION; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2012.04.019
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper, a new method for aggregating the opinions of experts in a preferential voting system is proposed. The method, which uses fuzzy concept in handling crisp data, is computationally efficient and is able to completely rank the alternatives. Through this method, the number of votes for certain rank position that each alternative receives are first grouped together to form fuzzy numbers. The nearest point to a fuzzy number concept is then used to introduce an artificial ideal alternative. Data envelopment analysis is next used to find the efficiency scores of the alternatives in a pair-wise comparison with the artificial ideal alternative. Alternatives are rank based on these efficiency scores. If the alternatives are not completely ranked, a weight restriction method also based on fuzzy concept is used on the un-discriminated alternatives until they are completely ranked. Two examples are given for illustration of the method. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 790
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [11] A DATA ENVELOPMENT MODEL FOR AGGREGATING PREFERENCE RANKINGS
    COOK, WD
    KRESS, M
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (11) : 1302 - 1310
  • [12] IDEA and AR-IDEA: Models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA
    Cooper, WW
    Park, KS
    Yu, G
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (04) : 597 - 607
  • [13] Dubois D., 1979, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, V2, P327, DOI 10.1016/0165-0114(79)90005-8
  • [14] Emrouznejad A., 2008, SOC EC PLANNING SCI, V42, P151, DOI [10.1016/j.seps.2007.07.002., DOI 10.1016/J.SEPS.2007.07.002]
  • [15] COOPER-framework: A unified process for non-parametric projects
    Emrouznejad, Ali
    De Witte, Kristof
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 207 (03) : 1573 - 1586
  • [16] An effective total ranking model for a ranked voting system
    Foroughi, AA
    Tamiz, M
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 33 (06): : 491 - 496
  • [17] A selection method for a preferential election
    Foroughi, AA
    Jones, DF
    Tamiz, M
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2005, 163 (01) : 107 - 116
  • [18] An integrated approach for rating engineering characteristics' final importance in product-service system development
    Geng, Xiuli
    Chu, Xuening
    Xue, Deyi
    Zhang, Zaifang
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 59 (04) : 585 - 594
  • [19] Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation
    Green, RH
    Doyle, JR
    Cook, WD
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 90 (03) : 461 - 472
  • [20] Nearest interval approximation of a fuzzy number
    Grzegorzewski, P
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2002, 130 (03) : 321 - 330