A multi-criteria decision making model for advanced repair-to-order and disassembly-to-order system

被引:52
|
作者
Ondemir, Onder [1 ]
Gupta, Surendra M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34349 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Northeastern Univ, Mech & Ind Engn Dept, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Sensor-embedded products; Disassembly-to-order; End-of-life management; Radio frequency identification (RFID); Linear physical programming; LOOP SUPPLY CHAINS; SENSOR EMBEDDED PRODUCTS; REVERSE LOGISTICS; AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; INFORMATION; OPERATIONS; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; UNCERTAINTY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Sensor-embedded products (SEPs) eliminate a majority of uncertainties involved in product recovery by providing item-based life-cycle information. This information includes the content of each product and component conditions, and enables the estimation of remaining useful life of the components. Once the data on the products are captured, it is possible to make optimal recovery decisions without any preliminary disassembly or inspection operations. This paper presents a multi-criteria advanced repair-to-order and disassembly-to-order (ARTODTO) system for SEPs. ARTODTO system deals with products that are embedded with sensors and RFID tags. The goal of the proposed approach is to determine how to process each and every end-of-life product (EOLP) on hand to meet remaining life based product and component demands as well as recycled material demand while optimizing an aggregate objective function. Demands are met by disassembly, repair, and recycling operations. Outside component procurement option is used to eliminate the component and material backorders. A linear physical programming (LPP) model is proposed to optimize the multi-criteria ARTODTO system. The LPP approach is explained in detail and a case example is considered to illustrate its application. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 419
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Supply chain risk evaluation based on fuzzy multi-criteria lattice-order decision-making
    Wen, Lei
    Xi, Zhaocai
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION AND LOGISTICS, VOLS 1-6, 2007, : 1442 - 1445
  • [42] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168
  • [43] Multi-Criteria Decision Making with Skyline Computation
    Choi, Wonik
    Liu, Ling
    Yu, Boseon
    2012 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION REUSE AND INTEGRATION (IRI), 2012, : 316 - 323
  • [44] Problem of Disassembly-To-Order System for Recycling Rate and Profit using Linear Physical Programming
    Kinoshita, Yuki
    Yamada, Tetsuo
    Gupta, Surendra M.
    25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCTION RESEARCH MANUFACTURING INNOVATION: CYBER PHYSICAL MANUFACTURING, 2019, 39 : 1597 - 1606
  • [45] Solving a disassembly-to-order system by using Genetic Algorithm and Weighted Fuzzy Goal Programming
    Imtanavanich, Prasit
    Gupta, Surendra M.
    ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS MANUFACTURING VI, 2006, 6385
  • [46] Methodological foundations of multi-criteria decision making
    Ogryczak, W
    Vetschera, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 158 (02) : 267 - 270
  • [47] Semantic Multi-Criteria Decision Making SeMCDM
    Mahmoudi, Ghadi
    Mueller-Schloer, Christian
    MCDM: 2009 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING, 2009, : 149 - 156
  • [48] Mutually Dependent Multi-criteria Decision Making
    Dalalah, Doraid
    Al-Tahat, Mohammad
    Bataineh, Khaled
    FUZZY INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 4 (02) : 195 - 216
  • [49] SUBJECTIVE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ESHRAGH, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1980, 13 (01): : 117 - 141
  • [50] FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING ALGORITHMS
    Peneva, Vania
    Popchev, Ivan
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES, 2010, 63 (07): : 979 - 992