A multi-criteria decision making model for advanced repair-to-order and disassembly-to-order system

被引:52
|
作者
Ondemir, Onder [1 ]
Gupta, Surendra M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34349 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Northeastern Univ, Mech & Ind Engn Dept, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Sensor-embedded products; Disassembly-to-order; End-of-life management; Radio frequency identification (RFID); Linear physical programming; LOOP SUPPLY CHAINS; SENSOR EMBEDDED PRODUCTS; REVERSE LOGISTICS; AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; INFORMATION; OPERATIONS; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; UNCERTAINTY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Sensor-embedded products (SEPs) eliminate a majority of uncertainties involved in product recovery by providing item-based life-cycle information. This information includes the content of each product and component conditions, and enables the estimation of remaining useful life of the components. Once the data on the products are captured, it is possible to make optimal recovery decisions without any preliminary disassembly or inspection operations. This paper presents a multi-criteria advanced repair-to-order and disassembly-to-order (ARTODTO) system for SEPs. ARTODTO system deals with products that are embedded with sensors and RFID tags. The goal of the proposed approach is to determine how to process each and every end-of-life product (EOLP) on hand to meet remaining life based product and component demands as well as recycled material demand while optimizing an aggregate objective function. Demands are met by disassembly, repair, and recycling operations. Outside component procurement option is used to eliminate the component and material backorders. A linear physical programming (LPP) model is proposed to optimize the multi-criteria ARTODTO system. The LPP approach is explained in detail and a case example is considered to illustrate its application. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 419
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multi-criteria decision making approach for disassembly-to-order systems
    Kongar, E
    Gupta, SM
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING, 2002, 11 (02): : 171 - 183
  • [2] Multi-criteria decision making for disassembly-to-order system under Stochastic yields
    Imtanavanich, P
    Gupta, SM
    ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS MANUFACTURING IV, 2004, 5583 : 147 - 162
  • [3] Disassembly-to-order system using linear physical programming
    Kongar, E
    Gupta, SM
    2002 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS & THE ENVIRONMENT, CONFERENCE RECORD, 2002, : 312 - 317
  • [4] Interval-based multi-criteria decision making: Strategies to order intervals
    Magoc, Tanja
    Ceberio, Martine
    Modave, Francois
    2008 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FUZZY INFORMATION PROCESSING SOCIETY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 534 - 539
  • [5] SYSTEMATIC DECISION MAKING: A EXTENDED MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING MODEL
    Yu, Xiaohan
    Xu, Zeshui
    Hu, Junquan
    Liu, Shousheng
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2017, 23 (01) : 157 - 177
  • [6] Learning the weights using attribute order information for multi-criteria decision making tasks
    Dombi, Jozsef
    Jonas, Tamas
    OPSEARCH, 2024, 61 (04) : 2379 - 2409
  • [7] MULTI-CRITERIA MODEL FOR DETERMINING ORDER SIZE
    Jakowska-Suwalska, Katarzyna
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND DECISIONS, 2013, 23 (02) : 43 - 54
  • [8] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system
    Wang, Jiang-Jiang
    Jing, You-Yin
    Zhang, Chun-Fa
    Shi, Guo-Hua
    Zhang, Xu-Tao
    ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (10) : 3823 - 3832
  • [9] A hybrid multi-criteria decision making model for ERP system selection
    Razmi, Jafar
    Sangari, Mohamad Sadegh
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND AUTOMATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY (ICIAFS), 2008, : 410 - +
  • [10] A software architecture for multi-criteria decision making for advanced robotics
    Kapoor, C
    Cetin, M
    Pryor, M
    Cocca, C
    Harden, T
    Tesar, D
    JOINT CONFERENCE ON THE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 1998, : 525 - 530