Children's Beliefs About Causes of Human Characteristics: Genes, Environment, or Choice?

被引:14
作者
Meyer, Meredith [1 ]
Roberts, Steven O. [2 ]
Jayaratne, Toby E. [3 ]
Gelman, Susan A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Otterbein Univ, Dept Psychol, 1 South Grove St, Westerville, OH 43081 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
children; conceptual development; genetic attributions; essentialism; PSYCHOLOGICAL ESSENTIALISM; BIOLOGY CURRICULUM; IMPLICIT THEORIES; GENETICS; CATEGORIES; UNDERSTANDINGS; GENDER; EXPLANATIONS; INFANTS; LABELS;
D O I
10.1037/xge0000751
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
To what extent do our genes make us nice, smart, or athletic? The explanatory frameworks we employ have broad consequences for how we evaluate and interact with others. Yet to date, little is known regarding when and how young children appeal to genetic explanations to understand human difference. The current study examined children's (aged 7-13 years) and adults' explanations for a set of human characteristics, contrasting genetic attributions with environmental and choice-based attributions. Whereas most adults and older children offered an unprompted genetic explanation at least once on an open-ended task, such explanations were not seen from younger children. However, even younger children, once trained on the mechanism of genes, endorsed genetic explanations for a range of characteristics- often in combination with environment and choice. Moreover, only adults favored genetic explanations for intelligence and athleticism; children, in contrast, favored environment and choice explanations for these characteristics. These findings suggest that children can employ genetic explanations in principled ways as early as 7 years of age but also that such explanations are used to account for a wider range of features by adults. Our study provides some of the first evidence regarding the ways in which genetic attributions emerge and change starting in early childhood.
引用
收藏
页码:1935 / 1949
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [41] Lanie Angela D, 2004, J Genet Couns, V13, P305, DOI 10.1023/B:JOGC.0000035524.66944.6d
  • [42] McIntosh Janet., 2018, The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1800, DOI 10.1002/9781118924396.WBIEA1800, 10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1800]
  • [43] PSYCHOLOGICAL ESSENTIALISM
    MEDIN, D
    ORTONY, A
    [J]. SIMILARITY AND ANALOGICAL REASONING, 1989, : 179 - 195
  • [44] Moore D.S., 2001, The dependent gene: The fallacy of "nature vs. nuture."
  • [45] Shifting ground: The variable use of essentialism in contexts of inclusion and exclusion
    Morton, Thomas A.
    Hornsey, Matthew J.
    Postmes, Tom
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 48 (01) : 35 - 59
  • [46] Theorizing Gender in the Face of Social Change: Is There Anything Essential About Essentialism?
    Morton, Thomas A.
    Postmes, Tom
    Haslam, S. Alexander
    Hornsey, Matthew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 96 (03) : 653 - 664
  • [47] Biases towards internal features in infants' reasoning about objects
    Newman, George E.
    Herrmann, Patricia
    Wynn, Karen
    Keil, Frank C.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2008, 107 (02) : 420 - 432
  • [48] Where is the essence? Developmental shifts in children's beliefs about internal features
    Newman, George E.
    Keil, Frank C.
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 79 (05) : 1344 - 1356
  • [49] Ohio Department of Education, 2011, SCI STAND
  • [50] Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool
    Paolacci, Gabriele
    Chandler, Jesse
    [J]. CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 23 (03) : 184 - 188