Reliability of the interRAI suite of assessment instruments: a 12-country study of an integrated health information system

被引:464
作者
Hirdes, John P. [1 ,2 ]
Ljunggren, Gunnar [3 ]
Morris, John N. [4 ]
Frijters, Dinnus H. M. [5 ]
Soveri, Harriet Finne [6 ]
Gray, Len [7 ]
Bjorkgren, Magnus [8 ]
Gilgen, Reudi [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Homewood Res Inst, Guelph, ON, Canada
[3] Stockholm Cty Council, S-11891 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Hebrew Sr Life, Boston, MA 02131 USA
[5] PRISMANT, NL-3528 BJ Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] STAKES, FIN-00531 Helsinki, Finland
[7] Univ Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hosp, Acad Unit Geriatr Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[8] Chydenius Inst, Kokkola 67100, Finland
[9] Klin Akutgeriatr, Stadtspital Waid Zurich, CH-8037 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-8-277
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A multi-domain suite of instruments has been developed by the interRAI research collaborative to support assessment and care planning in mental health, aged care and disability services. Each assessment instrument comprises items common to other instruments and specialized items exclusive to that instrument. This study examined the reliability of the items from five instruments supporting home care, long term care, mental health, palliative care and post-acute care. Methods: Paired assessments on 783 individuals across 12 nations were completed within 72 hours of each other by trained assessors who were blinded to the others' assessment. Reliability was tested using weighted kappa coefficients. Results: The overall kappa mean value for 161 items which are common to 2 or more instruments was 0.75. The kappa mean value for specialized items varied among instruments from 0.63 to 0.73. Over 60% of items scored greater than 0.70. Conclusion: The vast majority of items exceeded standard cut-offs for acceptable reliability, with only modest variation among instruments. The overall performance of these instruments showed that the interRAI suite has substantial reliability according to conventional cut-offs for interpreting the kappa statistic. The results indicate that interRAI items retain reliability when used across care settings, paving the way for cross domain application of the instruments as part of an integrated health information system.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Accuracy, validity and reliability in assessment and in evaluation of services for older people:: the role of the interRAI MDS assessment system [J].
Carpenter, G. Iain .
AGE AND AGEING, 2006, 35 (04) :327-329
[2]  
Carpenter GI, 2001, AGING-CLIN EXP RES, V13, P316
[3]  
Carpenter I, 2004, AGING CLIN EXP RES, V16, P259
[4]  
Fleiss J. L., 1981, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, V2nd
[5]   Approaching cross-national comparisons of nursing home residents [J].
Fries, BE ;
Schroll, M ;
Hawes, C ;
Gilgen, R ;
Jonsson, PV ;
Park, P .
AGE AND AGEING, 1997, 26 :13-18
[6]   Pain in US nursing homes: Validating a pain scale for the minimum data set [J].
Fries, BE ;
Simon, SE ;
Morris, JN ;
Flodstrom, C ;
Bookstein, FL .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2001, 41 (02) :173-179
[7]   Rethinking the resident assessment protocols [J].
Fries, Brant E. ;
Morris, John N. ;
Bernabei, Roberto ;
Finne-Soveri, Harriet ;
Hirdes, John .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2007, 55 (07) :1139-1140
[8]   Predictors of rehabilitation outcomes: A comparison of Israeli and Italian geriatric post-acute care (PAC) facilities using the minimum data set (MDS) [J].
Gindin, Jacob ;
Walter-Ginzburg, Adrian ;
Geitzen, Moshe ;
Epstein, Shulamit ;
Levi, Shmuel ;
Landi, Francisco ;
Bernabei, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2007, 8 (04) :233-242
[9]  
GRAY LC, 2008, J AM GERIATR SOC
[10]  
HARRIS MR, 2003, NATL HLTH INFORM INF