Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: A systematic review of facilitators and barriers

被引:254
作者
Antunes, Barbara [1 ]
Harding, Richard [1 ]
Higginson, Irene J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Palliat Care Policy & Rehabil, Cicely Saunders Inst, London SE5 9PJ, England
关键词
Palliative care; hospice; patient-reported outcome measures; narrative synthesis; clinical practice; end-of-life care; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ROUTINE PRACTICE; HEALTH-SERVICES; PAIN; COMMUNICATION; FRAMEWORK; CANCER; IMPACT; DISSEMINATION;
D O I
10.1177/0269216313491619
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Many patient-reported outcome measures have been developed in the past two decades, playing an increasingly important role in palliative care. However, their routine use in practice has been slow and difficult to implement. Aim: To systematically identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in different palliative care settings for routine practice, and to generate evidence-based recommendations, to inform the implementation process in clinical practice. Design: Systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. Data Sources: Medline, PsycInfo, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase and British Nursing Index were systematically searched from 1985. Hand searching of reference lists for all included articles and relevant review articles was performed. Results: A total of 3863 articles were screened. Of these, 31 articles met the inclusion criteria. First, data were integrated in the main themes: facilitators, barriers and lessons learned. Second, each main theme was grouped into either five or six categories. Finally, recommendations for implementation on outcome measures at management, health-care professional and patient levels were generated for three different points in time: preparation, implementation and assessment/improvement. Conclusions: Successful implementation of patient-reported outcome measures should be tailored by identifying and addressing potential barriers according to setting. Having a coordinator throughout the implementation process seems to be key. Ongoing cognitive and emotional processes of each individual should be taken into consideration during changes. The educational component prior to the implementation is crucial. This could promote ownership and correct use of the measure by clinicians, potentially improving practice and the quality of care provided through patient-reported outcome measure data use in clinical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 175
页数:18
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [31] Integrating Palliative Care Into HIV Outpatient Clinical Settings: Preliminary Findings From an Intervention Study in Vietnam
    Green, Kimberly
    Tuan, Tran
    Hoang, Tran Vu
    Trang, Nguyen Nguyen Thi
    Ha, Nguyen Thi Thanh
    Hung, Nguyen Duc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2010, 40 (01) : 31 - 34
  • [32] The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: lack of impact or lack of theory?
    Greenhalgh, J
    Long, AF
    Flynn, R
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 60 (04) : 833 - 843
  • [33] The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review
    Greenhalgh, J
    Meadows, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1999, 5 (04) : 401 - 416
  • [34] Teenage pregnancy and social disadvantage: systematic review integrating controlled trials and qualitative studies
    Harden, Angela
    Brunton, Ginny
    Fletcher, Adam
    Oakley, Ann
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 339 : 1182 - 1185
  • [35] The PRISMA Symposium 1: Outcome Tool Use. Disharmony in European Outcomes Research for Palliative and Advanced Disease Care: Too Many Tools in Practice
    Harding, Richard
    Simon, Steffen T.
    Benalia, Hamid
    Downing, Julia
    Daveson, Barbara A.
    Higginson, Irene J.
    Bausewein, Claudia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2011, 42 (04) : 493 - 500
  • [36] The use of the Rotterdam symptom checklist in palliative care
    Hardy, JR
    Edmonds, P
    Turner, R
    Rees, E
    A'Hern, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1999, 18 (02) : 79 - 84
  • [37] Measuring quality of life - Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting
    Higginson, IJ
    Carr, AJ
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7297): : 1297 - 1300
  • [38] The integrated implementation of two end-of-life care tools in nursing care homes in the UK: an in-depth evaluation
    Hockley, J.
    Watson, J.
    Oxenham, D.
    Murray, S. A.
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 24 (08) : 828 - 838
  • [39] Using the symptom monitor in a randomized controlled trial:: The effect on symptom prevalence and severity
    Hoekstra, J
    de Vos, R
    van Duijn, NP
    Schadé, E
    Bindels, PJE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2006, 31 (01) : 22 - 30
  • [40] HSaPRG DoPCHS (Department of Primary Care Heath Services), 2011, US PAT REP OUTC MEAS