Safeguard Power as a Protection Against Imprecise Power Estimates

被引:158
作者
Perugini, Marco [1 ]
Gallucci, Marcello [1 ]
Costantini, Giulio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milano Bicocca, I-20126 Milan, Italy
关键词
power analysis; replicability; safeguard; SAMPLE-SIZE; PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; STATISTICAL POWER; PREVALENCE; ACCURACY; RECOMMENDATIONS; REPLICABILITY; INCENTIVES; VALUES;
D O I
10.1177/1745691614528519
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
An essential first step in planning a confirmatory or a replication study is to determine the sample size necessary to draw statistically reliable inferences using power analysis. A key problem, however, is that what is available is the sample-size estimate of the effect size, and its use can lead to severely underpowered studies when the effect size is overestimated. As a potential remedy, we introduce safeguard power analysis, which uses the uncertainty in the estimate of the effect size to achieve a better likelihood of correctly identifying the population effect size. Using a lower-bound estimate of the effect size, in turn, allows researchers to calculate a sample size for a replication study that helps protect it from being underpowered. We show that in most common instances, compared with nominal power, safeguard power is higher whereas standard power is lower. We additionally recommend the use of safeguard power analysis to evaluate the strength of the evidence provided by the original study.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 332
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science [J].
Alexander, Anita ;
Barnett-Cowan, Michael ;
Bartmess, Elizabeth ;
Bosco, Frank A. ;
Brandt, Mark ;
Carp, Joshua ;
Chandler, Jesse J. ;
Clay, Russ ;
Cleary, Hayley ;
Cohn, Michael ;
Costantini, Giulio ;
DeCoster, Jamie ;
Dunn, Elizabeth ;
Eggleston, Casey ;
Estel, Vivien ;
Farach, Frank J. ;
Feather, Jenelle ;
Fiedler, Susann ;
Field, James G. ;
Foster, Joshua D. ;
Frank, Michael ;
Frazier, Rebecca S. ;
Fuchs, Heather M. ;
Galak, Jeff ;
Galliani, Elisa Maria ;
Garcia, Sara ;
Giammanco, Elise M. ;
Gilbert, Elizabeth A. ;
Giner-Sorolla, Roger ;
Goellner, Lars ;
Goh, Jin X. ;
Goss, R. Justin ;
Graham, Jesse ;
Grange, James A. ;
Gray, Jeremy R. ;
Gripshover, Sarah ;
Hartshorne, Joshua ;
Hayes, Timothy B. ;
Jahn, Georg ;
Johnson, Kate ;
Johnston, William ;
Joy-Gaba, Jennifer A. ;
Lai, Calvin K. ;
Lakens, Daniel ;
Lane, Kristin ;
LeBel, Etienne P. ;
Lee, Minha ;
Lemm, Kristi ;
Mackinnon, Sean ;
May, Michael .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 7 (06) :657-660
[2]   Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology [J].
Asendorpf, Jens B. ;
Conner, Mark ;
De Fruyt, Filip ;
De Houwer, Jan ;
Denissen, Jaap J. A. ;
Fiedler, Klaus ;
Fiedler, Susann ;
Funder, David C. ;
Kliegl, Reinhold ;
Nosek, Brian A. ;
Perugini, Marco ;
Roberts, Brent W. ;
Schmitt, Manfred ;
vanAken, Marcel A. G. ;
Weber, Hannelore ;
Wicherts, Jelte M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2013, 27 (02) :108-119
[3]   The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science [J].
Bakker, Marjan ;
van Dijk, Annette ;
Wicherts, Jelte M. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 7 (06) :543-554
[4]   The Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? [J].
Brandt, Mark J. ;
IJzerman, Hans ;
Dijksterhuis, Ap ;
Farach, Frank J. ;
Geller, Jason ;
Giner-Sorolla, Roger ;
Grange, James A. ;
Perugini, Marco ;
Spies, Jeffrey R. ;
van 't Veer, Anna .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 50 :217-224
[5]   Continuously Cumulating Meta-Analysis and Replicability [J].
Braver, Sanford L. ;
Thoemmes, Felix J. ;
Rosenthal, Robert .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 9 (03) :333-342
[6]   Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience [J].
Button, Katherine S. ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Mokrysz, Claire ;
Nosek, Brian A. ;
Flint, Jonathan ;
Robinson, Emma S. J. ;
Munafo, Marcus R. .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 14 (05) :365-376
[8]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
[10]  
Cumming G., 2010, The reviewer's guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences, P79, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203861554