Reliability of current classification systems for periprosthetic distal femur fractures

被引:3
|
作者
Makaram, Navnit S. [1 ,2 ]
Ross, Lauren A. [1 ]
Keenan, Oisin J. F. [1 ]
Magill, Matthew [2 ]
Moran, Matt
Scott, Chloe E. H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2022年 / 53卷 / 10期
关键词
Periprosthetic; Total Knee arthroplasty; Prognosis; Predictors; Knee Replacement; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; FEMORAL FRACTURES; OPEN REDUCTION; MORTALITY; REPLACEMENT; MANAGEMENT; FIXATION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.002
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study aims to determine which Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fracture (PDFF) classifica-tion system is the most reliable. The secondary aim was to determine which classification system corre-lated most accurately with the surgical management recommended and delivered. Methods: Between 2011 and 2019, 83 patients with 83 PDFFs that extended to the femoral component of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were retrospectively identified from a trauma database. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Age, BMI, time from TKA, operative management, and Nottingham Hip Fracture Scores were collected, and AP and lateral radiographs used to classify all fractures using seven established clas-sification systems by two observers blinded to management. In patients treated operatively ( n = 69), preoperative radiographs were reviewed by two surgeons with expertise in trauma and knee revision who recommended fixation or distal femoral replacement (DFR) requirement. Results: Mean age was 80.7 years (SD9.4) and 50 (84.7%) were female. PDFFs occurred at a mean 9.5 years (SD5.2) after primary TKA. Mean follow-up was 3.8 years (SD2.9). Management was fixation in 47, DFR in 22 and non-operative for 14. The Fakler classification demonstrated highest interobserver reliabil-ity (ICC = 0.948), followed by the Rorabeck (ICC = 0.903), UCS (ICC = 0.850) and Chen (ICC = 0.906). The Neer classification demonstrated weakest agreement (ICC = 0.633). Overall accuracy of predicting DFR require-ment (as determined by two experts) was highest for the Fakler system (83.9%). Compared with actual management delivered the Rorabeck system was most accurate (94.1%). Multivariate regression demon-strated that the ultimate need for DFR ( n = 22) was independently associated with medial comminution (HR 2.66 (1.12-6.35 95%CI), p = 0.027) and fractures distal to the anterior flange and posterior condyle of the femoral component (HR 2.45 (1.13-5.31), p = 0.024). Conclusion: The Fakler classification showed highest interobserver agreement and was most accurately predictive of the management recommended by two experts. No classification system accurately pre-dicted the fractures that required DFR, and none included medial comminution which was independently associated with DFR requirement. There remains a need for a PDFF classification system that reliably guides operative management of PDFFs. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3430 / 3437
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does distance from joint line influence complications after distal femur fractures in native and periprosthetic knees?
    Grisdela, Phillip, Jr.
    Striano, Brendan
    Shapira, Shay
    Heng, Marilyn
    KNEE, 2022, 37 : 80 - 86
  • [42] Current standard of care for distal femur fractures in Germany and Switzerland
    Von Rehlingen-Prinz, F.
    Eggeling, L.
    Dehoust, J.
    Huppke, C.
    Strahl, A.
    Neumann-Langen, M. V.
    Glaab, R.
    Frosch, K. H.
    Krause, M.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2023, 54 (10):
  • [43] Current Concepts in Management of Distal Femur Fractures
    Babhulkar, Sushrut
    Trikha, Vivek
    Babhulkar, Sudhir
    Gavaskar, Ashok S.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2024, 55
  • [44] Periprosthetic fractures - Diagnostics, classification and treatment
    Obbelode, F.
    Landschoof, S.
    Kreitz, N.
    Kuehne, C. A.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 2023, 56 (08): : 688 - 696
  • [45] Surgical outcomes of non-periprosthetic distal femur fragility fractures treated with a locking plate
    Liu, Jiayong
    Hein, David
    Huffman, Christopher
    Rao, Brian M.
    Cooper, Jonathan
    Ebraheim, Nabil A.
    ANNALS OF JOINT, 2022, 7
  • [46] Network Meta-Analysis of Open Reduction Internal Fixation, Intramedullary Nail Fixation, and Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures
    Lu, Yao
    Xu, Yibo
    Ren, Cheng
    Wang, Qian
    Sun, Liang
    Zhang, Chengcheng
    Huang, Qiang
    Xue, Hanzhong
    Li, Zhong
    Zhang, Kun
    Zhao, Yang
    Ma, Teng
    FRONTIERS IN MATERIALS, 2022, 9
  • [47] Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur following total knee arthroplasty: even very distal fractures can be successfully treated using internal fixation
    Kim, Wanlim
    Song, Joo Ho
    Kim, Jung-Jae
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (10) : 1951 - 1957
  • [48] Failure of Less-Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) plating for periprosthetic distal femur fractures Three case reports
    Tian Zhen-Jiang
    Liu Yan-Jie
    Chen Bo-Jian
    Wang Jun
    Niu Cai-Li
    Feng En-Hui
    Mai Xiu-Jun
    Huang Yong-Ming
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (08)
  • [49] Nail-Plate Constructs for Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures
    Mueller, Gudrun E. Mirick
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (05) : 403 - 406
  • [50] Interventions for treating fractures of the distal femur in adults
    Claireaux, Henry A.
    Searle, Henry Kc
    Parsons, Nick R.
    Griffin, Xavier L.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (10):