Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study

被引:61
|
作者
Roediger, Matthias [1 ]
Heinitz, Arthur [1 ]
Buergers, Ralf [1 ]
Rinke, Sven [1 ]
机构
[1] Georg August Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Univ Med Ctr Goettingen, Robert Koch Str 40, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
Zirconia crown; Digital impression; Cad/Cam; Fitting accuracy; Replica technique; MARGINAL FIT; CERAMIC CROWNS; IN-VITRO; RESTORATIONS; TECHNOLOGY; PERCEPTION; SILICONE; WORKFLOW; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-016-1924-y
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study focused on the clinical investigation of the internal and marginal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia single crowns produced via conventional and digital impression techniques. In a private practice, 20 molar teeth, one from each of 20 patients, were prepared with a circumferential 1.0-mm deep chamfer and an occlusal reduction of 1.5 mm. Conventional impression (CI) taking with a polyvinylsiloxane material (Aquasil Monophase + Aquasil XLV; Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) and intraoral scanning (IS) (Cara TRIOS; Heraeus, Hanau, Germany) of each of the preparations was performed, and then two respective zirconia copings per tooth were produced (20 crowns per group). The marginal and internal fit of the restorations was evaluated employing a replica technique. For statistical analysis, a pairwise comparison (Wilcoxon rank test) was performed. Zirconia single crowns produced with the IS technique revealed a statistically significant better precision of internal fit only in specific areas (chamfer area/occlusal area). The evaluation of marginal fit showed no significant differences between the two groups. All restorations of both groups offered internal and marginal gaps within the postulated clinical tolerance ranges. CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia single crowns produced with CI and IS techniques offer adequate marginal and internal precision. However, the IS technique provides lower internal gaps in some specific areas. The clinical precision of fit of restorations produced with a CI and an IS technique appeared to be equivalent. Therefore, the IS technique can be rated as a suitable alternative for the manufacturing of single crowns.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 587
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Accuracy of Digital Impressions versus Conventional Impressions in Neonates with Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Laboratory-Based Study
    Unnikrishnan, Jyotsna
    Bakr, Mahmoud
    Love, Robert
    Idris, Ghassan
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2024, 11 (07):
  • [22] Accuracy of digital impressions versus conventional impressions for 2 implants: an in vitro study evaluating the effect of implant angulation
    Jaafar Abduo
    Joseph E. A. Palamara
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 7
  • [23] Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression—a split-mouth randomised clinical study
    Yasser Haddadi
    Golnosh Bahrami
    Flemming Isidor
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2019, 23 : 4043 - 4050
  • [24] Retrospective clinical study of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated with a straightforward completely digital workflow
    Wu, Lifang
    Sun, Zhe
    Zhao, Jing
    Zheng, Yuanna
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 128 (05): : 913 - 918
  • [25] The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow—the comparison of two systems
    Petya K. Brawek
    Stefan Wolfart
    Lutz Endres
    Armin Kirsten
    Sven Reich
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2013, 17 : 2119 - 2125
  • [26] Accuracy and Efficiency of Digitally Fabricated All-Ceramic Crowns from Conventional Impressions and Intraoral Scans: A Single-Blind Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial
    Liu, Xinggang
    Feng, Kun
    Dong, Ling
    Liu, Lixia
    Ni, Lin
    Zheng, Dongxiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2024, 37 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [27] Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression-a split-mouth randomised clinical study
    Haddadi, Yasser
    Bahrami, Golnosh
    Isidor, Flemming
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 23 (11) : 4043 - 4050
  • [28] Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study
    Amin, Sarah
    Weber, Hans Peter
    Finkelman, Matthew
    El Rafie, Khaled
    Kudara, Yukio
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (11) : 1360 - 1367
  • [29] Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part I: digital versus conventional unilateral impressions
    Benic, Goran I.
    Muhlemann, Sven
    Fehmer, Vincent
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Sailer, Irena
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 116 (05): : 777 - 782
  • [30] A Clinical Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Accuracy between Digital and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques
    Alsharbaty, Mohammed Hussein M.
    Alikhasi, Marzieh
    Zarrati, Simindokht
    Shamshiri, Ahmed Reza
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (04): : E902 - E908