Histologic findings on prostate needle core biopsies following cryotherapy as monotherapy for prostatic adenocarcinoma

被引:4
作者
Gooden, Casey [1 ]
Nieh, Peter T. [2 ,3 ]
Osunkoya, Adeboye O. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Emory Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
Cryotherapy; Prostatic adenocarcinoma; Histologic findings; Prostate needle core biopsies; SALVAGE CRYOTHERAPY; THERAPY; CANCER; CRYOSURGERY; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.humpath.2012.08.012
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The histologic features seen in the prostate following cryotherapy can be highly variable. However, most previous studies were performed on specimens following salvage cryotherapy, which introduces additional confounding variables of the histologic changes after the other primary treatment modalities. We examined prostate needle core biopsies from a cohort of patients following cryotherapy as monotherapy for prostatic adenocarcinoma, to evaluate the true spectrum of morphologic changes in the prostate. Cases that had prior radiation therapy or androgen-deprivation therapy were excluded from the study. Thirty cases were identified. The average patient age was 69 years (range, 51-81 years), and the average time interval between cryotherapy and repeat biopsy was 19.2 months (range, 2-60 months). The original Gleason scores were as follows: 3 + 3 = 6 in 14 (46%) of 30 cases, 3 + 4 = 7 in 8 (27%) of 30 cases, 4 + 3 = 7 in 2(7%) of 30 cases, 4 + 4 = 8 in 3 (10%) of 30 cases, 4 + 5 = 9 in 2 (7%) of 30 cases, and 5 + 4 = 9 in 1 (3%) of 30 cases. Postcryotherapy, 11 of 30 cases (37%) had recurrent/residual prostatic adenocarcinoma, which showed no therapy-related changes, similar to the residual benign glands. Gleason scores were higher in 5 (46%) of 11 cases, same in 4 (36%) of 11 cases, and lower in 2 (18%) of 11 cases. Multiple additional histologic findings were documented. Unlike other nonsurgical therapeutic modalities, cases with recurrent/residual prostatic adenocarcinoma and benign glands showed therapy-related changes predominantly involving the stroma. It is therefore conceivable that benign or malignant prostatic glands are either completely destroyed during cryotherapy or left unaltered if not in the direct field of cryoablation. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 872
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Cryosurgery for prostate cancer: New technology and indications
    Benoit R.M.
    Cohen J.K.
    Miller R.J.
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2000, 1 (1) : 41 - 47
  • [2] CRYOSURGERY IN PROSTATIC-CANCER - SURVIVAL
    BONNEY, WW
    FALLON, B
    GERBER, WL
    HAWTREY, CE
    LOENING, SA
    NARAYANA, AS
    PLATZ, CE
    ROSE, EF
    SALL, JC
    SCHMIDT, JD
    CULP, DA
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1982, 19 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [3] Borkowski P, 1996, MODERN PATHOL, V9, P807
  • [4] Bostwick DG, 2007, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V131, P360
  • [5] Diagnosis of prostate cancer in needle biopsies after radiation therapy
    Cheng, L
    Cheville, JC
    Bostwick, DG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1999, 23 (10) : 1173 - 1183
  • [6] Treatment Effects in the Prostate Including Those Associated With Traditional and Emerging Therapies
    Evans, Andrew J.
    Ryan, Paul
    Van derKwast, Theodorus
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY, 2011, 18 (04) : 281 - 293
  • [7] Primary and Salvage Cryotherapy for Prostate Cancer
    Finley, David S.
    Pouliot, Frederic
    Miller, David C.
    Belldegrun, Arie S.
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 37 (01) : 67 - +
  • [8] Gonder M J, 1966, Invest Urol, V3, P372
  • [9] Histological changes in prostate biopsies after salvage cryotherapy: effect of chronology and the method of biopsy
    Izawa, Jonathan I.
    Busby, J. Erik
    Morganstern, Nora
    Vakar-Lopez, Funda
    Scott, Shellie M.
    Pisters, Louis L.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 98 (03) : 554 - 558
  • [10] Prostate cryotherapy: More questions than answers
    Merrick, GS
    Wallner, KE
    Butler, WM
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (01) : 9 - 15