Company environmental performance and consumer purchase intentions

被引:190
作者
Grimmer, Martin [1 ]
Bingham, Timothy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Management, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
Consumer behavior; Green marketing; Corporate social responsibility; Pricing; Consumer attitudes; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ETHICAL CONSUMER; BEHAVIOR; ATTITUDES; FRAMEWORK; PRODUCTS; VALIDITY; MATTER; PRICE; CSR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Evidence for the impact of CSR, and more specifically environmental, initiatives on consumer behavior is both contradictory and equivocal. This quasi-experimental study examines the relationship between the perceived environmental performance of a company (PEP) and consumers' purchase intentions, and then determines whether this relationship is moderated by the degree of consumers' environmental involvement (El) and by the relative price of company products. Surveys were posted to a random sample of residents in Hobart, the capital of Tasmania, Australia. Responses (n = 698) show that participants report higher purchase intention for products from high versus low PEP companies, and that participants' El and product price moderate this relationship. Those with high El report greater purchase intention for high PEP companies and the reverse for low PEP companies, indicating that participants with high El are more positively influenced by their perceptions of a company's environmental performance. However, participants are more likely to favor a high PEP company when the relative price of a product is low versus high, irrespective of their level of El. The strong relationship between companies' PEP and consumers' purchase intentions affirms that developing and managing an environmental brand image may deliver significant benefits, as long as it is appropriately communicated to consumers, and as long as consumers see the added value of making such purchases. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1945 / 1953
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Abdul-Muhmin A.G., 2007, INT J CONSUM STUD, V31, P237, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1470-6431.2006.00528.X
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]  
Ajzen I., 1980, Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior
[4]  
[Anonymous], 3235 0 POP AG SEX RE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ALL AC INT C AC MARK
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, MYTH ETHICAL CONSUME
[7]   What will consumers pay for social product features? [J].
Auger, P ;
Burke, P ;
Devinney, TM ;
Louviere, JJ .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2003, 42 (03) :281-304
[8]   Do what consumers say matter? the misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions [J].
Auger, Pat ;
Devinney, Timothy M. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 76 (04) :361-383
[9]  
Australian Communications and Media Authority, 2010, AUSTR HOUS CONS TAK
[10]  
Bhate S., 2001, Journal of Consumer Behavior, V2, P169